From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: Malicious Driver Detection not supported by ixgbe
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:04:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160224090429.68caf903@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456291984-7309-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:33:04 +0800
Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> wrote:
> + On Intel x550 series NICs, HW supports a feature called MDD (Malcicious
> + Driver Detection).
> + MDD is used to check the behavior of the VF driver. It means when transmitting
> + packets, the VF must use the advanced context descriptor and set it correctly.
> + And VF must set the CC (Check Context) bit either.
This is hard sentence to read, why not reword as:
The Intel x550 series NIC's support1 a feature called MDD (Malcicious
Driver Detection) which checks the behavior of the VF driver.
If this feature is enabled, the VF must use the advanced context descriptor
correctly and set the CC (Check Context) bit.
> + DPDK PF doesn't support MDD. We may hit problem in this scenario kernel PF +
> + DPDK VF. If user enables MDD in kernel PF, DPDK VF will not work. Because
> + kernel PF thinks the VF is malicious. But actually it's not. The only reason
> + is the VF doesn't act as MDD required.
> + There's significant performance impact to support MDD. DPDK should check if
> + the advanced context descriptor should be set and set it. And DPDK has to ask
> + the info about the header length from the upper layer, because parsing the
> + packet itself is not acceptale. So, it's too expensive to support MDD.
> + When using kernel PF + DPDK VF on x550, please make sure using the kernel
> + driver that disables MDD or can disable MDD. (Some kernel driver can use
> + this CLI 'insmod ixgbe.ko MDD=0,0' to disable MDD. Some kernel driver disable
> + it by default.)
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-24 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-24 5:33 Wenzhuo Lu
2016-02-24 17:04 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2016-02-25 1:13 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2016-02-26 4:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Wenzhuo Lu
2016-02-26 14:41 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-02-29 1:38 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2016-03-06 22:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-07 0:45 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2016-03-07 5:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Wenzhuo Lu
2016-03-07 20:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160224090429.68caf903@xeon-e3 \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).