From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1F92BCE for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 22:32:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2016 13:32:06 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,498,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="753358727" Received: from blesueur-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.7.68]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2016 13:32:04 -0800 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 21:32:03 +0025 Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 21:32:03 +0000 From: Bruce Richardson To: Keith Wiles Message-ID: <20160225213203.GB14936@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1456427356-67147-1-git-send-email-keith.wiles@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1456427356-67147-1-git-send-email-keith.wiles@intel.com> Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: add missing long-options for short option arguments X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 21:32:07 -0000 On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 01:09:16PM -0600, Keith Wiles wrote: > A number of short options for EAL are missing long options > and this patch adds those missing options. > > The missing long options are for: > -c add --coremask > -d add --driver > -l add --corelist > -m add --memsize > -n add --mem-channels > -r add --mem-ranks > -v add --version > Add an alias for --lcores using --lcore-map > > Signed-off-by: Keith Wiles Why do we need long options for all the short options? /Bruce