From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6E995FD for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 09:31:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Mar 2016 00:31:08 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,527,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="662364191" Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.66.49]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Mar 2016 00:31:07 -0800 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 16:32:25 +0800 From: Yuanhan Liu To: Santosh Shukla Message-ID: <20160302083225.GR14300@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1456750690-3210-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> <1456826540-15990-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1456826540-15990-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/3] virtio vector and misc X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 08:31:10 -0000 On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 03:32:17PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote: > - 1st patch: let non-x86 arch use virtio pmd driver in non-vec > - 2nd patch: enable virtio arm support > - 3rd patch: update virtio for arm feature entry in release guide. Series looks good to me: Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu However, FYI, Thomas would like to see that the release note is added __inside__ the patch that acutally enables it, but not in another standalone patch. In another word, you should squash patch 3 to patch 2. I'm wondering Thomas could do that for you this time while applying your pathces. But, this is just a kind remind, and you should not do that next time. --yliu