From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com (mail-pa0-f53.google.com [209.85.220.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4C42BA8 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 21:40:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id bj10so20305485pad.2 for ; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 12:40:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FgGekhgu7q0pdRYuN8vtcX0EjPUUSZjGKftLyl42fhk=; b=1eM4sEfZPfDL+tGEtp/dW+GP3MsNVYOpTXlNtVE0tBxRs4j7x+5pE3RDT+Ghgc1zco YSp9nOIEurEcbJ82hXGgFuDikrEl82i7L8paxj5BSE43/W3R0TfrLeJpumrkdWoVj6WR +JVzq3NkAqoiDSK5l9xzqLVroPtnsniW3890ybOxJ/RXYhjNz7vXkM+CCzFuGxRBPp02 cnz8bQYi3uZTfeSx237ANh2hVe5oyyEywLkxPDZ/8pSxvH+x7VHD3liyroT3M8ukefG/ qz95nu3UB/W0DsTmshhzX606ce4TVamHihvxUkN/yT6D5MsJyqHPyeDIkVb8SX73NYDn FIlQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FgGekhgu7q0pdRYuN8vtcX0EjPUUSZjGKftLyl42fhk=; b=edG1WZL84nF09iBp/cnv1CxZ+E43j/3pnlA2YpW9OEjkH2uWjxXZywXK8iwJ6rkngz XYNorZvaORN4eJj87ZEF4qxrr9VTa4EBA+XVDfMn7jV8Shz3Kh3kxoHo+Qg5p4wFLrsE hxOGdwtF84EFlwItI5D5DA2bxYhyn3YaenJ8fbb1IgDGqcbRo8LOUe8PPEo0NwJm/X2w bpqGht4qqMrtJZJlMN8+SKNqeiugN+NtfrMVaVnHfgPvGV658z7aoZLAw3DuyXeajmjK M+c1wprZm5nEQgDmjfke5Wm0LImSWm1JXaB9bCX4Gt/gv+9MZon0hGQhi2Mmn/13ge4N 7V4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJL4K6swa+tke/MA83ZcvhDnbSeHgW6P4fxsM387yPdtwattzGqsuJdfsVDJ8gRxrw== X-Received: by 10.66.231.100 with SMTP id tf4mr44721345pac.44.1457469639878; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 12:40:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from xeon-e3 (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.82.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e87sm6924251pfb.76.2016.03.08.12.40.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Mar 2016 12:40:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 12:40:51 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" Message-ID: <20160308124051.4225e0fd@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D89126479699F4@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1448822809-8350-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> <5760276.6KREI08Oct@xps13> <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D8912647968B0C@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <20160308083302.5709d431@xeon-e3> <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D89126479699F4@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 20:40:41 -0000 On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 19:53:01 +0000 "Dumitrescu, Cristian" wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 4:33 PM > > To: Dumitrescu, Cristian > > Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2 > > > > On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 07:49:20 +0000 > > "Dumitrescu, Cristian" wrote: > > > > > Regarding Stephen's patches, I think there is a pending issue regarding the > > legal side of the Copyright, which is attributed to Intel, although Stephen's > > code is relicensed with BSD license by permission from the original code > > author (which also submitted the code to Linux kernel under GPL). This was > > already flagged. This is a legal issue and I do not feel comfortable with ack-ing > > this patch until the legal resolution on this is crystal clear. > > > > > > I got explicit permission from the author who holds the copyright to relicense > > it. > > Did you get explicit permission from the author who holds the copyright to relicense it with BSD license that hands over the copyright to Intel? I got explicit permission to relicense as BSD. I believe DPDK does not require copyright assignment, and this is a standalone file. On Sat, Dec 20, 2014, at 01:24, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The kernel implementation of reciprocal divide is GPL licensed. > Is there any chance of getting a BSD license version to allow using > it in the DPDK? I absolutely don't have a problem to give my ack to make this dual-license. Where do I need to sign? ;) Bye, Hannes >> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014, at 01:24, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >>> The kernel implementation of reciprocal divide is GPL licensed. >>> Is there any chance of getting a BSD license version to allow using >>> it in the DPDK? >> >> I absolutely don't have a problem to give my ack to make this >> dual-license. Where do I need to sign? ;) I have absolutely no problem with that. Feel free to add my Signed-off-by to your DPDK submission. Merry X-Mas & thanks for asking! Daniel