DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] example/ipsec-secgw: ipsec security gateway
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:11:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160310034140.GA3491@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E0B7CA.8010204@intel.com>

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 11:54:50PM +0000, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> On 01/02/2016 11:26, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:09:16AM +0000, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> >>On 31/01/2016 14:39, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 08:29:12PM +0000, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> >>>
> 
> >>>IMO, an option for single SA based outbound processing would be useful
> >>>measuring performance bottlenecks with SA lookup.
> >>>
> >>Hi Jerin,
> >>
> >>Are you suggesting to have an option so we basically encrypt all traffic
> >>using
> >>a single SA bypassing the SP/ACL ?
> >Yes. Basicaly an option to bypass  "rte_acl_classify" if its for single
> >SA use case.
> >
> >
> 
> Hi Jerin,
> 
> After re-reading your comment regarding the single SA I just want to double
> check
> that I understood correctly what you were suggesting.
> 
> Basically an option that we can provide a single SA to use for outbound,
> skipping rte_acl_classify in outbound path.
> That same option would also skip rte_acl_classify in inbound path without
> checking
> that we accept specific traffic for an SA.
> 
> Is that correct?

Yes

> 
> Sergio

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-10  3:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-29 20:29 Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-01-31 14:39 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-02-01 11:09   ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-02-01 11:26     ` Jerin Jacob
2016-02-01 14:09       ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-09 23:54       ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-03-10  3:41         ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2016-02-24 13:32 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-24 14:49   ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-03-11  1:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-03-11  2:12   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-03-11  2:12   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-03-11 10:01     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-03-11 10:07       ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-11 10:02     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160310034140.GA3491@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).