DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Mohammad El-Shabani <mohammad.elshabani@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] librte_pmd_ixgbe implementation of ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_count
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:31:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160329093119.GC17800@bricha3-MOBL3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF_W8bccw4YAXNEVFwdTfWoFW_ZdrspTNVdtynigtAQLa4zsDQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:45:26PM -0700, Mohammad El-Shabani wrote:
> Hi,
> Looking into why it hurts performance, I see that ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_count
> is implemented a scan of elements of rx descriptors, which is very
> expensive. I am wondering why its implemented the way it is. Could it not
> just read the head location from the driver?
> 
> Thanks!
> Mohammad El-Shabani

It's likely that reading the head location from the driver will be even slower
than scanning the descriptor rings in memory. Access to PCI is very much slower
than accessing memory - especially since on platforms with DDIO, many memory
accesses will actually be cache reads.

That being said, I haven't actually written a test to prove this out, so feel
free to try out the head pointer read method instead and see if it improves
things. The results may vary depending on how far ahead needs to be scanned,
but certainly for the empty ring case, the descriptor scan method will be far
faster than a head read.

Regards,
/Bruce

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-29  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-29  1:45 Mohammad El-Shabani
2016-03-29  2:22 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2016-03-29  9:31 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2016-03-29 16:54   ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-30 14:23     ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160329093119.GC17800@bricha3-MOBL3 \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mohammad.elshabani@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).