DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Harish Patil <harish.patil@qlogic.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
	Rasesh Mody <rasesh.mody@qlogic.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Ameen Rahman <ameen.rahman@qlogic.com>,
	Sony Chacko <sony.chacko@qlogic.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 10/10] qede: Enable PMD build
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:01:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160421100110.GB976@bricha3-MOBL3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D33CFE29.1A8C73%harish.patil@qlogic.com>

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:43:44PM +0000, Harish Patil wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:51:06AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> 2016-04-20 00:14, Harish Patil:
> >> > >2016-03-31 19:15, Rasesh Mody:
> >> > >> --- a/config/common_base
> >> > >> +++ b/config/common_base
> >> > >> +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_QEDE_RX_COAL_US=24
> >> > >> +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_QEDE_TX_COAL_US=48
> >> > >
> >> > >It looks to be some tuning which could be done at runtime. Isn't it?
> >> >  
> >> > That’s right. Can you please suggest if there is any better option to
> >>make
> >> > it a runtime? There is no PMD API for that.
> >> 
> >> There are some devargs for that.
> >> For PCI dev, it can be passed in the whitelist option.
> >> We should remove this limitation by having a devargs API (and command
> >>line
> >> options) independent of whitelisting.
> >
> >But back to the original setting. Are these likely to be values that are
> >tunable
> >or need to be tunable by the user?
> 
> > 
> This is a tunable which is equivalent of ethtool -c (in linux) which
> controls the rate at which status block is updated.
> 
> >If not, I see little reason to make them
> >run-time configurable - they could be defines inside the driver itself.
> 
> There are defines already which set them to the defaults. The reason to
> expose it as config option is that the user don’t have to change the
> driver and rather just control it via config file. For now, I can remove
> it till we find a better alternative to make those run time. Please
> confirm and I can have it removed in next patch submission.
> 
Removing config options is always a good thing. As you say we can always find a
way to make them tunable in a later patchset.

/Bruce

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-21 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-01  2:15 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/10] qede: Add qede PMD Rasesh Mody
2016-04-01  2:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 01/10] qede: Add maintainers Rasesh Mody
2016-04-18 16:41   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-04-18 21:40     ` Harish Patil
2016-04-01  2:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 02/10] qede: Add documentation Rasesh Mody
2016-04-01  2:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 03/10] qede: Add license file Rasesh Mody
2016-04-01  2:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 04/10] qede: Add base driver Rasesh Mody
2016-04-01  2:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 05/10] qede: Add core driver Rasesh Mody
2016-04-01 15:41   ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-04-01 15:42   ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-04-19 12:35   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-04-19 12:59   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-04-20  1:09     ` Rasesh Mody
2016-04-20  8:54       ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-04-22 10:48         ` [dpdk-dev] Compiler minimum versions. (Was: [PATCH v5 05/10] qede: Add core driver) Bruce Richardson
2016-04-19 13:18   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 05/10] qede: Add core driver Thomas Monjalon
2016-04-20  1:10     ` Rasesh Mody
2016-04-01  2:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 06/10] qede: Add L2 support Rasesh Mody
2016-04-01  2:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 07/10] qede: Add SRIOV support Rasesh Mody
2016-04-01  2:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 08/10] qede: Add attention support Rasesh Mody
2016-04-01  2:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 09/10] qede: Add DCBX support Rasesh Mody
2016-04-19 12:51   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-04-01  2:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 10/10] qede: Enable PMD build Rasesh Mody
2016-04-18 15:34   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-04-20  0:07     ` Harish Patil
2016-04-18 15:37   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-04-20  0:14     ` Harish Patil
2016-04-20  8:51       ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-04-20  9:25         ` Bruce Richardson
2016-04-20 16:43           ` Harish Patil
2016-04-21 10:01             ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2016-04-20 16:36         ` Harish Patil
2016-04-01 15:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/10] qede: Add qede PMD Stephen Hemminger
2016-04-01 15:51   ` Harish Patil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160421100110.GB976@bricha3-MOBL3 \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ameen.rahman@qlogic.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=harish.patil@qlogic.com \
    --cc=rasesh.mody@qlogic.com \
    --cc=sony.chacko@qlogic.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).