From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wes1-so2.wedos.net (wes1-so2.wedos.net [46.28.106.16]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB0A6A1A for ; Mon, 9 May 2016 17:20:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz (pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.13.147]) by wes1-so2.wedos.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3r3R0g2MMjz1P2; Mon, 9 May 2016 17:20:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 17:19:00 +0200 From: Jan Viktorin To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson , David Marchand Message-ID: <20160509171900.592a3565@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <2406220.vlQ29PEzMg@xps13> References: <1462531720-26217-1-git-send-email-viktorin@rehivetech.com> <1462531720-26217-3-git-send-email-viktorin@rehivetech.com> <2406220.vlQ29PEzMg@xps13> Organization: RehiveTech MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 02/10] app/test: support resources externally linked X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 15:20:51 -0000 On Fri, 06 May 2016 16:32:53 +0200 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > It looks a lot too much tricky to be integrated without code comments ;) > Please make a documentation effort. > [...] Thomas, is it OK to include the PCI test enhancements? Or should I post only the fixed "resource framework"? Regards Jan -- Jan Viktorin E-mail: Viktorin@RehiveTech.com System Architect Web: www.RehiveTech.com RehiveTech Brno, Czech Republic