From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f177.google.com (mail-pf0-f177.google.com [209.85.192.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796C1ADAC for ; Tue, 10 May 2016 17:59:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 206so7359740pfu.0 for ; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:59:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OzxZ8Kn+iN04AtQIpR+wZQCGeEyn0TYETfQ/BiJGID0=; b=RwR19fdSvQNxQ3nQsWnmNgK3f6jjSX5lTlVHe1V5m/LWLLP5lFzVXMsXjnNEj/tc2W GEsD/pbg4IQzvNwwr91iMCyNoeG1jKvLsJ0U6wAWv1hhmdon5Q4X+4ppjt1GkM4IZy9E HcEpApalw1gcrNiAwPmBPPKT7csMlJqydGU6kJGJ9cYtWrEJBiVLi44mgAekjDqptQJ2 wsdr+LsvzVjLLj4eHREjKCp8V3y6LgZyo8Rwz7ebFVejELstDBwLMNBk3ksGPFLS99O6 qdmrJz7PfJdBwI2rzpGYJFHMzOoueh5DxgZBxBH8Ph0DjdoJdrtLqj+pEkxwnqUIKLM7 yREA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OzxZ8Kn+iN04AtQIpR+wZQCGeEyn0TYETfQ/BiJGID0=; b=fe8TOcbXffEU4c9R/RjhWZbaTBc4T1UNjuFRYaO4QkUNjyrVrXC2WS8xeBpVm7/Qu9 3jE4bhlBiJSYblM4CkTB4hFKtMRyu4ve3vLce46i571SFYMATx5CWB8Y3grj0I5VtfP1 64bno4paqjuvJC1QIkVMtwM2VoE5vPyzniYN9wv9NG0syMvykoBFSqMxTJrCA7LvGs/s GEZlvfYhRWv3+1oE4RQnponYsgBC38bofd0IxO0yWhkwqvGz2bIXdy7KpeT6jQnnQijB VZvXyNfDQdm650uDeLSvYOC0omXiDK5gu6P1szdqvjQmUqyQMrxLP7r1ZcX6/hFryssF X2KA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUICkneUUUItpmczOkqCMCYlPeO1pKGzPgBdQH/p2vKHgesCT6Wp475RReuRI4uDw== X-Received: by 10.98.69.213 with SMTP id n82mr59587336pfi.48.1462895941892; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:59:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xeon-e3 (static-50-53-72-186.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.72.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ey12sm5504209pac.26.2016.05.10.08.59.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 May 2016 08:59:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 08:59:15 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Zhe Tao Cc: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20160510085915.529b4af5@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <1462879301-13570-1-git-send-email-zhe.tao@intel.com> References: <1462879301-13570-1-git-send-email-zhe.tao@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] igu_uio: fix IOMMU domain issue X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:59:02 -0000 On Tue, 10 May 2016 19:21:41 +0800 Zhe Tao wrote: > Problem: > The following operations will cause the igb_uio based DPDK > operation failed. > --Any device assignment through the kvm_assign_device interface, > this can be the pci-assign method in QEMU > --VFIO group attachment operation(attach to the container) > this can happens in vfio-pci assignment in QEMU If you have an IOMMU why not use VFIO instead, it is better.