DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: "Mauricio Vásquez" <mauricio.vasquezbernal@studenti.polito.it>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Ring PMD: why are stats counters atomic?
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 10:36:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160510093629.GA1508@bricha3-MOBL3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPwdgqjR1eSt5ewcdm93WNT-ZX7ychWUSdSZvbU22Rapat3ybQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:13:08AM +0200, Mauricio Vásquez wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Per-queue stats counters are defined as rte_atomic64_t, in the tx/rx
> functions, they are atomically increased if the rings have the multiple
> consumers/producer flag enabled.
> 
> According to the design principles, the application should not invoke those
> functions on the same queue on different cores, then I think that atomic
> increasing is not necessary.
> 
> Is there something wrong with my reasoning?, If not, I am willing to send a
> patch.
> 
> Thank you very much,
> 
Since the rte_rings, on which the ring pmd is obviously based, have multi-producer
and multi-consumer support built-in, I thought it might be useful in the ring
PMD itself to allow multiple threads to access the ring queues at the same time,
if the underlying rings are marked as MP/MC safe. When doing enqueues and dequeue
from the ring, the stats are either incremented atomically, or non-atomically,
depending on the underlying queue type.

        const uint16_t nb_rx = (uint16_t)rte_ring_dequeue_burst(r->rng,
                        ptrs, nb_bufs);
        if (r->rng->flags & RING_F_SC_DEQ)
                r->rx_pkts.cnt += nb_rx;
        else
                rte_atomic64_add(&(r->rx_pkts), nb_rx);

If people don't think this behaviour is worthwhile keeping, I'm ok with removing
it, since all other PMDs have the restriction that the queues are single-thread
only.

Regards,
/Bruce

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-10  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-10  9:13 Mauricio Vásquez
2016-05-10  9:36 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2016-05-16 13:12   ` Mauricio Vásquez
2016-05-16 13:16     ` Bruce Richardson
2016-08-15 20:41       ` Mauricio Vásquez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160510093629.GA1508@bricha3-MOBL3 \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mauricio.vasquezbernal@studenti.polito.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).