From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f170.google.com (mail-pf0-f170.google.com [209.85.192.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143C15A8F for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 17:21:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 206so19779649pfu.0 for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 08:21:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9Z0AhmxD2Ro3y+8uYzPHnpcTvtX8aOT9/WLnlYvx+PA=; b=l7rIYmRsCKcduMu5oFOZN4GyNMn0v6Kdf6f9k1Gs4HKrWTETwprYLdhk7NpXOovkfN Clmt1xNxj5jkECVKJXHsSAU9t8Y+y7apaqN+oVq8h+lsOTF2+jF0ozD/7sgepLi3nbvn Fb4x07wj4iaeClHOO51ygYAz9oMiSGgd+uc8Txvrjc6hj/xfsOB80oAyDu3VSPgt+sJu sdKlH989VeO8vdBdOro/E4cMTHsYwoFM+nmXuec5aHXQnOZ2P63jhpdF+IShnytQs6fk T3P7+Yh+7t3m1b3Do+u1LYr/QG74gnrm1FFUt/eYCBwTcpJd4/+/z4oWNq/TPbNJhxru OdwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9Z0AhmxD2Ro3y+8uYzPHnpcTvtX8aOT9/WLnlYvx+PA=; b=G6orioqmA5fqzW6V7CG9Dzun5b5FxwHBXLojDhSiN7H8eDelDe3iUnXThR+kRidrOx k80Ige9CW61IqaiOE8YDvUadCTP/g2LzV1F7km1i3X40LDw8Z8bhwPGdxuBW/vgc/acT NOyyM5qEl02Gj/qj68MowJT5xJnbcZPeafo1GzYbln4toRM3dxoEsCRxUYQDWkkqIWO2 ZaGYkJkiI5fBKLPBTHld9TnTuNdl5qnm36qrrOwTxHwYIC/2IZO5P9cIp7hNT8jG6qzn G6xhHUcu9O2INyGX9b2kB5wja6pQKi5F4yPrNFrlqAjGi7BFEzOJDLPnRODM7i0gskWh WP7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWnB7t5FIlmvZ9Rqvhi1YhYOtKwTZfwLfr91DO814vaRtulNf76Gdq6TpqbbwfeeQ== X-Received: by 10.98.53.65 with SMTP id c62mr5798362pfa.47.1462980072462; Wed, 11 May 2016 08:21:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xeon-e3 (static-50-53-72-186.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.72.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h88sm13040496pfd.10.2016.05.11.08.21.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 May 2016 08:21:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 08:21:26 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Ziye Yang Cc: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20160511082126.38639f1d@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <1462946895-49958-1-git-send-email-ziye.yang@intel.com> References: <1462946895-49958-1-git-send-email-ziye.yang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: Add the class_id support in pci probe X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 15:21:13 -0000 On Wed, 11 May 2016 14:08:15 +0800 Ziye Yang wrote: > This patch is used to add the class_id (class_code, > subclass_code, programming_interface) support for > pci_device probe. With this patch, it will be > flexible for users to probe a class of devices > by class_id. > > Signed-off-by: Ziye Yang I like this, and it is necessary but since rte_pci_id is a visible data structure it causes ABI breakage.