From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096CE388F for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 17:25:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 May 2016 08:25:58 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,364,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="110335830" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.220.175]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 25 May 2016 08:25:56 -0700 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 25 May 2016 16:25:55 +0025 Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 16:25:55 +0100 From: Bruce Richardson To: Stephen Hurd Cc: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20160525152555.GD12776@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1463179589-82681-1-git-send-email-stephen.hurd@broadcom.com> <1463179589-82681-5-git-send-email-stephen.hurd@broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1463179589-82681-5-git-send-email-stephen.hurd@broadcom.com> Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 05/40] bnxt: add dev configure operation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 15:25:59 -0000 On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 03:45:54PM -0700, Stephen Hurd wrote: > This adds the bnxt_hwrm_port_phy_cfg() HWRM call, and copies required > information into the new struct bnxt_link_info. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hurd > Reviewed-by: Ajit Kumar Khaparde > --- > drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt.h | 32 +++ > drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 24 ++ > drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c | 232 +++++++++++++++- > drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.h | 1 + > drivers/net/bnxt/hsi_struct_def_dpdk.h | 470 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 758 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > Again, a minor issue: checkpatch flags a couple of instances of "unsigned" instead of "unsigned int" in this patch. Maybe just scan the rest of the set with checkpatch to pick up on other minor niggles like this. /Bruce