DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] vhost: optimize dequeue for small packets
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:44:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160601064403.GA10038@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4C7C0175@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 06:24:18AM +0000, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 5/3/2016 8:42 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > Both current kernel virtio driver and DPDK virtio driver use at least
> > 2 desc buffer for Tx: the first for storing the header, and the others
> > for storing the data.
> 
> Tx could prepend some space for virtio net header whenever possible, so
> that it could use only one descriptor.

In such case, it will work as well: it will goto the "else" code path
then.

> Another thing is this doesn't reduce the check because you also add a check.

Actually, yes, it does save check. Before this patch, we have:

	while (not done yet) {
 	       if (desc_is_drain)
 	               ...;

 	       if (mbuf_is_full)
 	               ...;

 	       COPY();
	}

Note that the "while" check will be done twice, therefore, it's 4
checks in total. After this patch, it would be:

	if (virtio_net_hdr_takes_one_desc)
		...

	while (1) {
		COPY();

		if (desc_is_drain) {
			break if done;
			...;
		}

		if (mbuf_is_full {
			/* small packets will bypass this check */
			....;
		}
	}

So, for small packets, it takes 2 checks only, which actually saves
2 checks.

	--yliu

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-01  6:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-03  0:46 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] [RFC] vhost: micro vhost optimization Yuanhan Liu
2016-05-03  0:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] vhost: pre update used ring for Tx and Rx Yuanhan Liu
2016-06-01  6:40   ` Xie, Huawei
2016-06-01  6:55     ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-06-03  8:18       ` Xie, Huawei
2016-06-01 13:05     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-05-03  0:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] vhost: optimize dequeue for small packets Yuanhan Liu
2016-06-01  6:24   ` Xie, Huawei
2016-06-01  6:44     ` Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2016-06-03  7:42       ` Xie, Huawei
2016-06-03  7:43   ` Xie, Huawei
2016-05-03  0:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] vhost: arrange virtio_net fields for better cache sharing Yuanhan Liu
2016-06-01  6:42   ` Xie, Huawei
2016-05-10 21:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] [RFC] vhost: micro vhost optimization Rich Lane
2016-05-10 22:08   ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-06-14 12:42 ` Yuanhan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160601064403.GA10038@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com \
    --to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=huawei.xie@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).