From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38CAADEA for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:08:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Jun 2016 08:08:40 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,439,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="997873053" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.220.95]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 08 Jun 2016 08:08:38 -0700 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 08 Jun 2016 16:08:37 +0025 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:08:37 +0100 From: Bruce Richardson To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Jerin Jacob , Ferruh Yigit , dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20160608150837.GA24684@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1464540424-12631-1-git-send-email-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <57580FE4.3060808@intel.com> <20160608124319.GA4449@localhost.localdomain> <28207692.5xZGMHagFl@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <28207692.5xZGMHagFl@xps13> Organization: Intel Research and =?iso-8859-1?Q?De=ACvel?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?opment?= Ireland Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/20] DPDK PMD for ThunderX NIC device X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 15:08:42 -0000 On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:42:14PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-06-08 18:13, Jerin Jacob: > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:30:28PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > > Hi Jerin, > > > > > > In patch subject, as tag, other drivers are using only driver name, and > > > Intel drivers also has "driver/base", since base code has some special > > > case. For thunderx, what do you think about keeping subject as: > > > "thunderx: ...." > > > > > > > Hi Ferruh, > > > > We may add crypto or other builtin ThunderX HW accelerated block drivers > > in future to DPDK. > > So that is the reason why I thought of keeping the subject as thunderx/nicvf. > > If you don't have any objection then I would like to keep it as > > thunderx/nicvf or just nicvf. > > I don't like the name nicvf but I guess that's the official name? > > Thus I agree the title should be thunderx/nicvf or thunderx_nicvf. I think I'd prefer the underscore version. /Bruce