From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, huawei.xie@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: fix allocating virtnet_rx not mem aligned
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 20:44:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160614124432.GZ10038@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465741782-126976-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 02:29:42PM +0000, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> Compile DPDK with clang, below line in virtio_rxtx.c could be
> optimized with four "VMOVAPS ymm, m256".
> memset(&rxvq->fake_mbuf, 0, sizeof(rxvq->fake_mbuf));
>
> This instruction requires memory address is 32-byte aligned.
> Or, it leads to segfault. Although only tested with Clang 3.6.0,
> it can be reproduced in any compilers, which do aggressive
> optimization, aka, change memset of known length to VMOVAPS.
>
> The fact that struct rte_mbuf is cache line aligned, can only make
> sure fake_mbuf is aligned compared to the start address of struct
> virtnet_rx. Unfortunately, this address is not necessarily aligned
> because it's allocated by:
> rxvq = (struct virtnet_rx *)RTE_PTR_ADD(vq, sz_vq);
>
> When sz_vq is not aligned, then rxvq cannot be allocated with an
> aligned address, and then rxvq->fake_mbuf (addr of rxvq + cache line
> size) is not an aligned address.
>
> The fix is very simple that making sz_vq 32-byte aligned. Here we
> make it cache line aligned for future optimization.
>
> Fixes: a900472aedef ("virtio: split virtio Rx/Tx queue")
Folded this fix (and the other fix) to above commit, so that we could
have a clean working tree.
Thanks for good catch!
--yliu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-14 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-12 14:29 Jianfeng Tan
2016-06-13 9:21 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-06-13 9:51 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-06-13 10:06 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-06-13 10:26 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-06-13 10:15 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-06-14 12:44 ` Yuanhan Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160614124432.GZ10038@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com \
--to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=huawei.xie@intel.com \
--cc=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).