From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wes1-so1.wedos.net (wes1-so1.wedos.net [46.28.106.15]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4474CC4D2 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:56:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz (pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.13.147]) by wes1-so1.wedos.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3rV23f6nsjz9Jp; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:56:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:51:40 +0200 From: Jan Viktorin To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@6wind.com Message-ID: <20160615115140.7b6f781a@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <3619975.NzbGfMYzOD@xps13> References: <1465911981-26372-1-git-send-email-viktorin@rehivetech.com> <3619975.NzbGfMYzOD@xps13> Organization: RehiveTech MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test: remove rte_pci_dev_ids.h from pci_autotest X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:56:47 -0000 On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:08:42 +0200 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-06-14 15:46, Jan Viktorin: > > There are 2 new fake devices for testing PCI infra. All the fake devices s/All the fake/All 3 fake/ > > are now identified by non-existing vendor and device IDs so there is no > > real driver to bind to them. The testing drivers match those IDs. > > Why not removing the existing sysfs entries faking real devices? There is no reason to remove anything. All 3 devices are fakes. The original one was changed to have fake IDs. Is it more clear now? Jan > Thanks