From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wes1-so1.wedos.net (wes1-so1.wedos.net [46.28.106.15]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A88EC4F8 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:54:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz (pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.13.147]) by wes1-so1.wedos.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3rVgHJ5Wjtz8rg; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:54:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:48:59 +0200 From: Jan Viktorin To: Shreyansh Jain Cc: Thomas Monjalon , David Marchand , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Iremonger, Bernard" Message-ID: <20160616124859.0238c7ea@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: References: <1454076516-21591-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com> <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C21A010557@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <1620661.VgMl8ZQWnK@xps13> Organization: RehiveTech MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/17] prepare for rte_device / rte_driver X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:54:05 -0000 On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 08:42:29 +0000 Shreyansh Jain wrote: > Hi, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 1:04 PM > > To: Shreyansh Jain > > Cc: David Marchand ; viktorin@rehivetech.com; > > dev@dpdk.org; Iremonger, Bernard > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/17] prepare for rte_device / rte_driver > > > > 2016-06-16 06:32, Shreyansh Jain: > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Iremonger, Bernard > > > > Patches 3,8,16 and 17 no longer apply to the latest master branch. > > > > A rebase is needed. > > > > > > With the recent most head (04920e6): 01, 03, 08, 15, 16 and 17 are failing. > > > > > > Just wanted to check if there is a rebase of this series anytime soon? > > > > I will take care of this series if time permit. > > Ok. > By the way, I have already rebased it on master. I can post the patches here if you want. > (only trivial conflicts were there) Sounds good. +1 I'd rebase my patchset on top of it and repost. > > > It would help to have more reviews on other series touching EAL, like > > pmdinfo. > > Ok. I can try and review this, non-PCI/SoC and similar patchset in next few days. The original David's patchset was quite OK. I didn't have any comments. The thing is (from my POV) that it was incomplete. Jan > > > > > > I was looking at Jan's non-PCI patchset [1] and they are based on this > > series. > > > > > > [1] > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.dpdk.devel/30913/focus=38486 > > - > Shreyansh >