From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wes1-so2.wedos.net (wes1-so2.wedos.net [46.28.106.16]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AEC5CC5C for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:46:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz (pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.13.147]) by wes1-so2.wedos.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3rWNPC6xBPz2bM; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:46:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:41:35 +0200 From: "Jan Viktorin" To: David Hunt Cc: dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, shreyansh.jain@nxp.com Message-ID: <20160617164135.1b8326a8@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <1466171618-27358-4-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com> References: <1466080236-112618-1-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com> <1466171618-27358-1-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com> <1466171618-27358-4-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com> Organization: RehiveTech MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14 3/3] mbuf: make default mempool ops configurable at build X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:46:40 -0000 On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:53:38 +0100 David Hunt wrote: > By default, the mempool ops used for mbuf allocations is a multi > producer and multi consumer ring. We could imagine a target (maybe some > network processors?) that provides an hardware-assisted pool > mechanism. In this case, the default configuration for this architecture > would contain a different value for RTE_MBUF_DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_OPS. > > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz > Signed-off-by: David Hunt > Acked-by: Shreyansh Jain > Acked-by: Olivier Matz > --- Reviewed-by: Jan Viktorin