From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8B1C3D4 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:43:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Jun 2016 03:43:01 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,520,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="834446649" Received: from singalsu-mobl4.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.31.226]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 24 Jun 2016 03:42:59 -0700 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 24 Jun 2016 11:42:59 +0025 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 11:42:59 +0100 From: Bruce Richardson To: Nelson Escobar Cc: dev@dpdk.org, johndale@cisco.com Message-ID: <20160624104258.GA13456@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1465948557-14753-1-git-send-email-neescoba@cisco.com> <1466104745-21528-1-git-send-email-neescoba@cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1466104745-21528-1-git-send-email-neescoba@cisco.com> Organization: Intel Research and =?iso-8859-1?Q?De=ACvel?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?opment?= Ireland Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] enic: scattered Rx X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:43:03 -0000 On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:19:05PM -0700, Nelson Escobar wrote: > For performance reasons, this patch uses 2 VIC RQs per RQ presented to > DPDK. > > The VIC requires that each descriptor be marked as either a start of > packet (SOP) descriptor or a non-SOP descriptor. A one RQ solution > requires skipping descriptors when receiving small packets and results > in bad performance when receiving many small packets. > > The 2 RQ solution makes use of the VIC feature that allows a receive > on primary queue to 'spill over' into another queue if the receive is > too large to fit in the buffer assigned to the descriptor on the > primary queue. This means that there is no skipping of descriptors > when receiving small packets and results in much better performance. > > Signed-off-by: Nelson Escobar > Reviewed-by: John Daley > --- > Applied to dpdk-next-net/rel_16_07 /Bruce