DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com, keith.wiles@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mempool: rename functions with confusing names
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:09:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160630120950.GB15232@bricha3-MOBL3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98f41037-a666-53b6-efce-65a73a218d29@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 03:02:22PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 06/30/2016 03:00 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >2016-06-29 17:27, Bruce Richardson:
> >>Fix this by introducing two new functions to replace the old ones,
> >>* rte_mempool_avail_count to replace rte_mempool_count
> >>* rte_mempool_in_use_count to replace rte_mempool_free_count
> >
> >This patch needs to be rebased please.
> >
> >>--- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool_version.map
> >>+++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool_version.map
> >>@@ -32,5 +32,6 @@ DPDK_16.07 {
> >> 	rte_mempool_populate_virt;
> >> 	rte_mempool_register_ops;
> >> 	rte_mempool_set_ops_byname;
> >>+	rte_mempool_avail_count;
> >
> >The "in_use_count" function is missing.
> 
> Its missing because the function is static inline. If you ask me, this would
> be as fine time as any to remove that inlining ;)
> 
> 	- Panu -
> 
Yep, and yep.
V3 needed, I'll see what I can do.

/Bruce

> >Please keep alphabetical order.
> >
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-30 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-29 13:55 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Bruce Richardson
2016-06-29 15:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-06-29 16:00   ` Bruce Richardson
2016-06-29 16:02     ` Wiles, Keith
2016-06-29 16:05       ` Olivier MATZ
2016-06-29 16:19         ` Richardson, Bruce
2016-06-29 16:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
2016-06-29 16:30   ` Bruce Richardson
2016-06-30 12:00   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-06-30 12:02     ` Panu Matilainen
2016-06-30 12:09       ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2016-06-30 12:08     ` Bruce Richardson
2016-06-30 12:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Bruce Richardson
2016-06-30 20:05   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-01  8:57     ` Olivier MATZ
2016-07-01 10:21       ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160630120950.GB15232@bricha3-MOBL3 \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=pmatilai@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).