DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
	"Loftus, Ciara" <ciara.loftus@intel.com>,
	Huawei Xie <huawei.xie@intel.com>,
	"Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>,
	"Wang, Zhihong" <zhihong.wang@intel.com>,
	"Hu, Jiayu" <jiayu.hu@intel.com>,
	Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] remove vhost-cuse
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:59:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160711035955.GA18850@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> (raw)

It's something echoed around in my mind for a long while, and here I'm
gonna make it public: a proposal to remove vhost-cuse.

Vhost-cuse was invented before vhost-user exist. The both are actually
doing the same thing: a vhost-net implementation in user space. But they
are not exactly the same thing.

Firstly, vhost-cuse is harder for use; no one seems to care it, either.
Furthermore, since v2.1, a large majority of development effort has gone
to vhost-user. For example, we extended the vhost-user spec to add the
multiple queue support. We also added the vhost-user live migration at
v16.04 and the latest one, vhost-user reconnect that allows vhost app
restart without restarting the guest. Both of them are very important
features for product usage and none of them works for vhost-cuse.

You now see that the difference between vhost-user and vhost-cuse is
big (and will be bigger and bigger as time moves forward), that you
should never use vhost-cuse, that we should drop it completely.

The remove would also result to a much cleaner code base, allowing us
to do all kinds of extending easier.

A talk with Huawei offline showed that he backs this proposal. I was
also told by Ciara that she actually had the same idea: she has already
cooked a patch to remove vhost-cuse support from OVS:

    http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-July/074696.html

So I'm proposing to mark vhost-cuse as deprecated in this release and
remove it completely at the next release (v16.11).

Comments/thoughts, or objections?

	--yliu

             reply	other threads:[~2016-07-11  3:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-11  3:59 Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2016-07-15  8:42 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-15  9:14   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-15 12:29     ` Yuanhan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160711035955.GA18850@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com \
    --to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=huawei.xie@intel.com \
    --cc=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
    --cc=jiayu.hu@intel.com \
    --cc=mukawa@igel.co.jp \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).