DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] unify tools naming
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:46:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160722014657.GM28708@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469024670-4638-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 04:24:30PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> The following tools may be installed system-wise.

Yes, indeed. Following is an example from dpdk package shipped in
ubutun 16.04:

    dpdk: /etc/dpdk/dpdk.conf
    dpdk: /etc/dpdk/interfaces
    dpdk: /etc/init.d/dpdk
    dpdk: /lib/dpdk/dpdk-init
    dpdk: /lib/systemd/system/dpdk.service
    dpdk: /sbin/dpdk_nic_bind
    dpdk: /usr/bin/dpdk_proc_info
    dpdk: /usr/bin/testpmd
    dpdk: /usr/share/doc/dpdk/changelog.Debian.gz
    dpdk: /usr/share/doc/dpdk/copyright
    dpdk: /usr/share/dpdk/tools/cpu_layout.py
    dpdk: /usr/share/dpdk/tools/dpdk_nic_bind.py
    dpdk: /usr/share/dpdk/tools/setup.sh

> It may be cleaner and more convenient to find them with the same
> dpdk- prefix (especially for autocompletion).

Agreed.

> Moreover, the script dpdk_nic_bind.py deserves a new name because it is
> not restricted to NICs and can be used for e.g. crypto.

Second that. But we might need doc the name change to let user aware of
that.

> These files are renamed:
> pmdinfogen       -> dpdk-pmdinfogen
> pmdinfo.py       -> dpdk-pmdinfo.py
> dpdk_pdump       -> dpdk-pdump
> dpdk_proc_info   -> dpdk-procinfo
> dpdk_nic_bind.py -> dpdk-devbind.py
> setup.sh         -> dpdk-setup.sh
> 
> The tools pmdinfogen, pmdinfo.py and dpdk_pdump are new in 16.07.
> 
> The scripts dpdk_nic_bind.py and setup.sh may have been used with
> previous releases by end users. That's why a symbolic link still
> provide the old name in the installed tools directory.

I was about suggesting the same thing: yes, we should keep the
backward compatibility.

	--yliu

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-22  1:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-20 14:24 Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-22  1:46 ` Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2016-07-22  8:04   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-22 10:36     ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-22 20:31       ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160722014657.GM28708@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com \
    --to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).