From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE04C5591 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 14:33:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cpe-2606-a000-111b-40ed-7aac-c0ff-fec2-933b.dyn6.twc.com ([2606:a000:111b:40ed:7aac:c0ff:fec2:933b] helo=localhost) by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1bjQQe-0006I3-HT; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:33:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:33:32 -0400 From: Neil Horman To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Thomas Monjalon , dev@dpdk.org, Finn Christensen Message-ID: <20160912123332.GC22847@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <20160908111424.14127-1-fc@napatech.com> <20160909135108.GA15908@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <1913786.NX7M2nQ5WY@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] ntnic: add PMD driver X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:33:43 -0000 On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 11:31:04AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > I think that if the driver is just a shim for proprietary code, then the > vendor should just maintain it out of tree. 6wind and windriver already do > this. Agreed, this was my previous comment. Someone probably wants this driver, but I dont' want to maintain a shim. Until its ready to be all open source, just maintain it out of tree Neil