DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Kavanagh, Mark B" <mark.b.kavanagh@intel.com>
Cc: "'Dey, Souvik'" <sodey@sonusnet.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4]net/virtio: add mtu set in virtio
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:11:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160920071152.GR23158@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DC5AD7FA266D86499789B1BCAEC715F85C70A5E4@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:15:37PM +0000, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
> >
> >>+{
> >>+       struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
> >>+       uint32_t ether_hdr_len = ETHER_HDR_LEN + ETHER_CRC_LEN +
> >>+VLAN_TAG_LEN;
> >>+       uint32_t frame_size = mtu + ether_hdr_len;
> >>+
> >>+       virtio_dev_info_get(dev, &dev_info);
> >>+
> >>+       if (mtu < dev_info.min_rx_bufsize || frame_size >
> >>+dev_info.max_rx_pktlen) {
> >
> >It's not clear to me whether 'mtu' in this case should be compared with ETHER_MIN_MTU, as per
> >other DPDK drivers, or alternatively whether 'frame_size' should be compared with
> >dev_info.min_rx_bufsize.
> >Any thoughts?
> >[Dey, Souvik] I am not sure why virtio min_rx_bufsize is less than ETHER_MIN_MTU, i think it
> >will be good to have the  compare statement as
> >If(frame_size < ETHER_MIN_MTU || frame_size > dev_info.max_rx_pktlen) , then error. What do
> >you suggest ?
> 
> Again, this all depends on what 'mtu' means in this context.
> 
> Since you mentioned previously that it relates to the packet (i.e. L3) length, and not the frame (i.e. L2) length, I would suggest that the comparison should be:
> 
> 	if (mtu < ETHER_MIN_MTU || frame_size > dev_info.max_rx_pktlen)
> 
> Yuanhan, any thoughts on this?

I think you are right. At least, that's how the ixgbe PMD driver code
looks like.

	--yliu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-09-20  7:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-07  4:18 souvikdey33
2016-09-07  4:21 ` Dey, Souvik
2016-09-09  7:00   ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-09-09 14:19     ` Dey, Souvik
2016-09-09 15:05       ` Kavanagh, Mark B
2016-09-09 15:33         ` Dey, Souvik
2016-09-09 15:42           ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-09-09 15:43           ` Kavanagh, Mark B
2016-09-09 18:16             ` Dey, Souvik
2016-09-12 14:25               ` Dey, Souvik
2016-09-12 14:47               ` Kavanagh, Mark B
2016-09-12 15:11                 ` Dey, Souvik
2016-09-14  0:25                   ` Dey, Souvik
2016-09-14  4:32                     ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-09-14 12:15                   ` Kavanagh, Mark B
2016-09-14 21:12                     ` Dey, Souvik
2016-09-20  7:11                     ` Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2016-09-20 18:42                       ` Dey, Souvik
2016-09-21  2:21                         ` Yuanhan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160920071152.GR23158@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com \
    --to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mark.b.kavanagh@intel.com \
    --cc=sodey@sonusnet.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).