From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D7C47D2 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:35:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Sep 2016 00:35:35 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,381,1470726000"; d="scan'208";a="764762474" Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.67.162]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Sep 2016 00:35:34 -0700 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:36:03 +0800 From: Yuanhan Liu To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: "Mussar, Gary" , "Mcnamara, John" , dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20160923073603.GX23158@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1472822193-107410-1-git-send-email-gmussar@ciena.com> <2048535.gxr77GMEX2@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2048535.gxr77GMEX2@xps13> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Tools: Fix issue with virtio interface names X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 07:35:37 -0000 On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 04:46:52PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-09-22 10:34, Mussar, Gary: > > I am new at submitting patches to dpdk.org. This patch has been acked and patchwork claims success on build it: http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/15595/ > > > > Other users state it has corrected their problems. Am I supposed to be doing something else with it before it gets applied to master? > > No, thanks Gary. > It will be applied as soon as a lazy guy starts doing his work :) Hmm., I just found this has been assinged to me in patchwork... Thomas, should I apply it to next-virtio tree, or you will apply it on yours? --yliu