From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f47.google.com (mail-lf0-f47.google.com [209.85.215.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E211F2E41 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:19:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf0-f47.google.com with SMTP id x79so126819990lff.0 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 06:19:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2Jfb8iYgJR6AZwMQxit7TjKfU35wL8lDXIjUNRYUY18=; b=A4j48a1aX2rj/UrrwzbFjJc2RLnu/b/fh8KxpR7UqroxtMLfMuP8L73AqyWlPP3VLG ljkVPdHRsIzaEz/Vc4ortfXa4a3VWcdy0xRtCn2x+bFdsIoDnz46Huy1+pwLUvqPeUO1 TxQNByyT6+TEKGlqs8THljvWY1lk8pja2PMQzNPm1lcmj8NCgBARR70nY7sEXvuS3OpW 7TArELWLgUqEde6UoEJBzNL0qYbKL2LL0w+1HFj1bGd5ChFlSokH571EJODdGhkeVzGg w5zuK97XAWqkpxkOOWo9tarSW4vqz/r2Hool81dBv0iPPv8oq9niIIVHmNStmjwDWd50 9nyg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2Jfb8iYgJR6AZwMQxit7TjKfU35wL8lDXIjUNRYUY18=; b=J7WwXnG46WU6ocRqmD+A2MP8Ltgm0WsfkkC2uiP3cgWzvQvi+r/CjwyPsFkKGhKGQE lT6cplHgiNV87/ti/+db4z2+/SoRiX9rDvBgtI6XwlGxJwsGtvvX5k1o5C0o29ow8OG7 g9kBwXpoX5jWBHfYAu7minTYJZGSOgwEQbUjIFNDLG4hHpHwUxH4pzO5AXnA7/INmQks HfiTG48qLf9aL79TqIFBnzlbwCbWhb9G6pNg3pGMSKXTDqQTDYBnOGLVQg5bLv/LGgDs 1zHdfN6vLuafWHSTTtekZaSljQZeNOGUAjudnlYQTuVM+D4rpGjBCcf51AwZdGR42psj ASEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnnDCWo061KjvrT3CzU73R2itx4HhQU/8LEmznuU99YToOl41joi0Cpipfud4ttDmzm X-Received: by 10.194.39.101 with SMTP id o5mr29802663wjk.192.1476105575481; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 06:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6wind.com (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id rk14sm40027153wjb.6.2016.10.10.06.19.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Oct 2016 06:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:19:27 +0200 From: Adrien Mazarguil To: "Zhao1, Wei" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Message-ID: <20161010131927.GK17252@6wind.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2] Generic flow director/filtering/classification API X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 13:19:36 -0000 Hi Wei, On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:42:53AM +0000, Zhao1, Wei wrote: > Hi Adrien Mazarguil, > > In your v2 version of rte_flow.txt , there is an action type RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MARK, but there is no definition of struct rte_flow_action_mark. > And there is an definition of struct rte_flow_action_id. Is it a typo or other usage? > > Thank you. > > struct rte_flow_action_id { > uint32_t id; /**< 32 bit value to return with packets. */ > }; That is indeed a mistake, this struct should be named "rte_flow_action_mark". I'll fix it for the next update, thanks. -- Adrien Mazarguil 6WIND