From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767956CB7 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:36:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Oct 2016 08:36:53 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,329,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="1043266570" Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.67.162]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Oct 2016 08:36:51 -0700 Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 23:37:47 +0800 From: Yuanhan Liu To: Olivier MATZ Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, sugesh.chandran@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, jianfeng.tan@intel.com, helin.zhang@intel.com, adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, dprovan@bivio.net, xiao.w.wang@intel.com Message-ID: <20161011153747.GF16751@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1475485223-30566-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <20161011113555.GC16751@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> <57FCD792.80504@6wind.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57FCD792.80504@6wind.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/12] net/virtio: add offload support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:36:54 -0000 On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 02:14:10PM +0200, Olivier MATZ wrote: > Hi Yuanhan, > > On 10/11/2016 01:35 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > >Hi, > > > >Firstly, apologize for so late review. It's been forgotten :( > > > >BTW, please feel free to ping me in future if I made no response > >in one or two weeks! > > > >I haven't reviewed it carefully yet (something I will do tomorrow). > >Before that, few quick questions. > > > >Firstly, would you write down some test steps? Honestly, I'm not > >quite sure how that works without the TCP/IP stack. > > Not sure I'm getting your question. > The test plan described in the cover letter works without any dpdk tcp/ip > stack. It uses testpmd, which is able to bridge packets and ask for TCP > segmentation. Oops, I thought the patch list is the end of the cover letter :( It looks like a great doc after a first glimpse. I will look at your code tomorrow. Thanks. --yliu