From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F24268CF
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 10:29:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32])
 by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2016 01:29:58 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,361,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="20714463"
Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.67.162])
 by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2016 01:29:57 -0700
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:30:50 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, zhihong.wang@intel.com, ciara.loftus@intel.com
Message-ID: <20161018083050.GI16751@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1476717036-17399-1-git-send-email-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
 <67f1efc4-e476-1f5c-137a-1e36aceb73bf@redhat.com>
 <20161018081221.GH16751@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <28badf80-7915-6b99-7632-77772130bc4d@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <28badf80-7915-6b99-7632-77772130bc4d@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: disable indirect descriptors feature
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:30:00 -0000

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:13:54AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> >>Thanks to Zhihong series you reworked, the changes to be done for
> >>mergeable buffers case is greatly simplified.
> >>I'll send the series later today.
> >
> >Do you mean the v6 from Zhihong? Unluckily, it will not be merged. That
> >series has been simplified to not rewrite the enqueue from scratch. See
> >V7.
> No, I meant the v7.

Oh, glad to know that the rework helps here :)

	--yliu
> 
> >
> >For this patch, I think you should also update (or remove?) the related
> >section in the release note.
> Yes, sure.
> 
> Thanks,
> Maxime