From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pinero.vault24.org (pinero.vault24.org [69.164.212.126]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0FFBB0A for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 06:20:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from feynman.vault24.org (feynman.vault24.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:7b5::14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pinero.vault24.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03BDE602E for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:20:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by feynman.vault24.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8ED0D402328F; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:20:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:20:09 -0400 From: Jon DeVree To: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20161026042009.ktsazbm3qf6kbxdr@feynman.vault24.org> Mail-Followup-To: dev@dpdk.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK & ASLR X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 04:20:10 -0000 On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 15:18:03 -0700, Samir Shah wrote: > Does ASLR need to be turned off system-wide, or DPDK-processes wide? Could > we use setarch/personality to disable ASLR for just the DPDK process and > leave it enabled for the rest of the system? Any experience to say if that > would work or not? > I'm using setarch/personality to disable it only in the processes using dpdk without any trouble. -- Jon Doge Wrangler X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1) and tmux(1).