From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9ACF2B8A for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:13:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id a197so133219219wmd.0 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 04:13:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=aGPreHhjAERQFKLZTEUktu2ya137Y6btv/cdTIK8q2w=; b=D38lXCNDLkR9QfqNhXWnwO0ACpeGQ0U966OuTreAH8+LN5KSAwvkq8YZF8aYyauH5b +nu5Uq51VnItetuk9V7k0MNgox4zslCujpww/VXjnKEId7xKebMHtZcMs0jMiJ8mePkP 5+FB3LZRsGHU+AqYqHOBZopgdUfQkNkyG/lhPMgBsk4tgIFTb7byqoVX7p8i3mxT9t6E jLITqeU1LKf2mMs7BnRpKjcUlxN9aPhOqZ2hE9AjovCuXOKcKUE9qc3TOuXj/V/qAL3M pU3pKazOad5ZmG52DtEHhote769qWT/rPIj/j+O4qvN/swxq/+xWBkoXMuEkKnW1XdLp 05JA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=aGPreHhjAERQFKLZTEUktu2ya137Y6btv/cdTIK8q2w=; b=eNs3UAHC3HoEQJTLBJBCmq9Of4t6zzirVYE8ZWFJsZguAtpm65+dWcHnaUj/aVaVwV /sj4lSJH8eOEHdnK1/Tv8zXoABa7PblqmrpOhnNLIBZQ2qRzH9CgoyVa3L8z+a+S3C2a M7rtq0HuGqHADK8/EqssbfYW4z45Usd+7epHNlpXDTzYJ0FKrdEsGGGvOw3SMFZiiDjd 4f7thYKRcrT3WLGJnDTOk0dwDi0P0mu0mcO9o7uNR8Qxk7RQcQ0+2s5vKdpG9VDFTLvh 4JyF6Cqz13qcQqdYh+kncTm+wn+N29wh78rEzvN+tfyiXlDoRLUrm5vIWyhaa3SdcCPe 9mRA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfr0Mf9D0CkyT+ChT+sgyvPlGlynUUYvxKaozahJmX/V7nZoTvkYCYeTMReE4tQC+pg X-Received: by 10.28.178.205 with SMTP id b196mr2240226wmf.8.1478085191479; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 04:13:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6wind.com (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id wh3sm2063218wjb.49.2016.11.02.04.13.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Nov 2016 04:13:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:13:03 +0100 From: Adrien Mazarguil To: "Zhang, Helin" Message-ID: <20161102111303.GB5733@6wind.com> References: <20160705181646.GO7621@6wind.com> <20160929171053.GP17252@6wind.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2] Generic flow director/filtering/classification API X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 11:13:12 -0000 Hi Helin, On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 07:19:18AM +0000, Zhang, Helin wrote: > Hi Adrien > > Just a double check, do you have any update on the v1 patch set, as now it is the end of October? > We are extremly eager to see the v1 patch set for development. > I don't think we need full validation on the v1 patch set for API. It should be together with PMD and example application. > If we can see the v1 API patch set earlier, we can help to validate it with our code changes. That's should be more efficient and helpful. > Any comments on my personal understanding? > > Thank you very much for the hard work and kind helps! I intend to send it shortly, likely this week. For the record, a large part of this task was also dedicated to implement it on the client side (I've just read Wei's RFC for a client-side application to which I will reply separately), in order to validate it from a usability standpoint that led me to make a few necessary adjustments to the API. My next submission will include both the updated API with several changes discussed on this ML and testpmd code (not a separate application) that uses it. Just hang on a bit longer! > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Adrien Mazarguil > > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:11 AM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: Thomas Monjalon > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2] Generic flow director/filtering/classification > > API > > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 08:50:44PM +0200, Adrien Mazarguil wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Thanks to many for the positive and constructive feedback I've > > > received so far. Here is the updated specification (v0.7) at last. > > > > > > I've attempted to address as many comments as possible but could not > > > process them all just yet. A new section "Future evolutions" has been > > > added for the remaining topics. > > > > > > This series adds rte_flow.h to the DPDK tree. Next time I will attempt > > > to convert the specification as a documentation commit part of the > > > patchset and actually implement API functions. > > [...] > > > > A quick update, we initially targeted 16.11 as the DPDK release this API would > > be available for, turns out this goal was somewhat too optimistic as > > September is ending and we are about to overshoot the deadline for > > integration (basically everything took longer than expected, big surprise). > > > > So instead of rushing things now to include a botched API in 16.11 with no > > PMD support, we simply modified the target, now set to 17.02. On the plus > > side this should leave developers more time to refine and test the API before > > applications and PMDs start to use it. > > > > I intend to send the patchset for the first non-draft version mid-October > > worst case (ASAP in fact). I still haven't replied to several comments but did > > take them into account, thanks for your feedback. > > > > -- > > Adrien Mazarguil > > 6WIND -- Adrien Mazarguil 6WIND