DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: Satha Rao <skoteshwar@caviumnetworks.com>,
	"Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
	"jianbo.liu@linaro.org" <jianbo.liu@linaro.org>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] i40e: Fix eth_i40e_dev_init sequence on ThunderX
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 03:46:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161121221638.GA17380@svelivela-lt.caveonetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0DE265@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:21:43PM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> Hi
> > 
> > i40e_asq_send_command: rd32 & wr32 under ThunderX gives unpredictable
> >                        results. To solve this include rte memory barriers
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Satha Rao <skoteshwar@caviumnetworks.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/i40e/base/i40e_osdep.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/base/i40e_osdep.h b/drivers/net/i40e/base/i40e_osdep.h
> > index 38e7ba5..ffa3160 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/base/i40e_osdep.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/base/i40e_osdep.h
> > @@ -158,7 +158,13 @@ do {                                                            \
> >  	((volatile uint32_t *)((char *)(a)->hw_addr + (reg)))
> >  static inline uint32_t i40e_read_addr(volatile void *addr)
> >  {
> > +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
> > +	uint32_t val = rte_le_to_cpu_32(I40E_PCI_REG(addr));
> > +	rte_rmb();
> > +	return val;
> 
> If you really need an rmb/wmb with MMIO read/writes on ARM,
> I think you can avoid #ifdefs here and use rte_smp_rmb/rte_smp_wmb.
> BTW, I suppose if you need it for i40e, you would need it for other devices too.

Yes. ARM would need for all devices(typically, the devices on external PCI bus).
I guess rte_smp_rmb may not be the correct abstraction. So we need more of
rte_rmb() as we need only non smp variant on IO side. I guess then it make sense to
create new abstraction in eal with following variants so that each arch
gets opportunity to make what it makes sense that specific platform

rte_readb_relaxed
rte_readw_relaxed
rte_readl_relaxed
rte_readq_relaxed
rte_writeb_relaxed
rte_writew_relaxed
rte_writel_relaxed
rte_writeq_relaxed
rte_readb
rte_readw
rte_readl
rte_readq
rte_writeb
rte_writew
rte_writel
rte_writeq

Thoughts ?

Jerin

> Konstantin
> 
> > +#else
> >  	return rte_le_to_cpu_32(I40E_PCI_REG(addr));
> > +#endif
> >  }
> >  #define I40E_PCI_REG_WRITE(reg, value) \
> >  	do { I40E_PCI_REG((reg)) = rte_cpu_to_le_32(value); } while (0)
> > @@ -171,8 +177,16 @@ static inline uint32_t i40e_read_addr(volatile void *addr)
> >  	I40E_PCI_REG_WRITE(I40E_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg)), (value))
> > 
> >  #define rd32(a, reg) i40e_read_addr(I40E_PCI_REG_ADDR((a), (reg)))
> > +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
> > +#define wr32(a, reg, value) \
> > +	do { \
> > +		I40E_PCI_REG_WRITE(I40E_PCI_REG_ADDR((a), (reg)), (value)); \
> > +		rte_wmb(); \
> > +	} while (0)
> > +#else
> >  #define wr32(a, reg, value) \
> >  	I40E_PCI_REG_WRITE(I40E_PCI_REG_ADDR((a), (reg)), (value))
> > +#endif
> >  #define flush(a) i40e_read_addr(I40E_PCI_REG_ADDR((a), (I40E_GLGEN_STAT)))
> > 
> >  #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr)/sizeof(arr[0]))
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-21 22:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-18 12:52 Satha Rao
2016-11-18 15:00 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-20 23:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-11-21 22:16   ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2016-11-22 13:46     ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-22 18:49       ` Jerin Jacob
2016-11-30 17:52         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-11-30 20:54           ` Jerin Jacob
2016-12-01 11:38             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-02-07 14:33 ` Ferruh Yigit
     [not found] <mailman.4.1479684107.2722.dev@dpdk.org>
2016-11-30  1:23 ` Asok Tiyyagura

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161121221638.GA17380@svelivela-lt.caveonetworks.com \
    --to=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=jianbo.liu@linaro.org \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=skoteshwar@caviumnetworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).