From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from rere.qmqm.pl (rere.qmqm.pl [84.10.57.10]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266D236E for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 18:19:12 +0100 (CET) Received: by rere.qmqm.pl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7FF866082; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 18:19:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 18:19:11 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Miros=B3aw?= To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20161214171911.nupex5gi5jxbbbhm@rere.qmqm.pl> References: <817f957e-80c3-bfc0-e02b-55f397581708@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <817f957e-80c3-bfc0-e02b-55f397581708@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-07-23) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/13] KNI: provided netif name's source is user-space X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:19:12 -0000 On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 05:06:23PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On 12/13/2016 1:08 AM, Michał Mirosław wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław > > --- > > lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_misc.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_misc.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_misc.c > > index 497db9b..f0247aa 100644 > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_misc.c > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_misc.c > > @@ -363,8 +363,8 @@ kni_ioctl_create(struct net *net, uint32_t ioctl_num, > > up_read(&knet->kni_list_lock); > > > > net_dev = alloc_netdev(sizeof(struct kni_dev), dev_info.name, > > -#ifdef NET_NAME_UNKNOWN > > - NET_NAME_UNKNOWN, > > +#ifdef NET_NAME_USER > > + NET_NAME_USER, > > Probably NET_NAME_USER fits better to definition. > But functionally, I wonder if you have a use case to use > "name_assign_type" ? I just read what NET_NAME_UNKNOWN/NET_NAME_USER is supposed to do. UNKNOWN is for "old" drivers that don't know the source of the name. USER is for a name, that comes from a user and as such is not to be renamed by udev. Best Regards, Michał Mirosław