From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from rere.qmqm.pl (rere.qmqm.pl [84.10.57.10]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCB010DCA for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 02:47:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by rere.qmqm.pl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F1FB36082; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 02:47:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 02:47:52 +0100 From: Michal Miroslaw To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Message-ID: <20161223014752.wicbgkvlotllsfc6@rere.qmqm.pl> References: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0F2997@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0F2997@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-07-23) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] acl: remove invalid test X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:47:53 -0000 On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 06:48:52PM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > Hi Michal, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michał Mirosław [mailto:mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 5:24 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin > > Subject: [PATCH] acl: remove invalid test > > > > rte_acl_add_rules() has no way of checking rule size. > > > > This was hidden because the test effectively checked that > > adding a rule with userdata == 0 failed. > I suppose that changes have to be inside: > [PATCH v2] acl: allow zero verdict. The 'allow zero verdict' patch depends on this one if we are to not have a breaking tests inbetween. Otherwise, it is an independent change. I guess I can merge them, though, if you prefer it that way. Best Regards, Michał Mirosław