From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] scripts: check cc stable mailing list in commit
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:51:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170116095152.GQ9770@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b249c77-5685-8492-6f6b-3478a2731267@intel.com>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:54:14PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/21/2016 10:43 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Add a check for commits fixing a released bug.
> > Such commits are found thanks to scripts/git-log-fixes.sh.
> > They must be sent CC: stable@dpdk.org.
> > In order to avoid forgetting CC, this mail header can be written
> > in the git commit message.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
>
> I think this is useful, thanks for the patch.
Yes, it is. Thanks! (Sorry for late reply; hope it's not too late).
> > +[ -z "$bad" ] || printf "Should CC: stable@dpdk.org\n$bad\n"
>
> This is good for developer, but since "CC: xx" tags removed when patch
> applied,
Again, I'd suggest to __not__ remove such tag. Firstly, why bother? And
I will talk why this tag should be kept, as a stable tree maintainer.
At the beginning, when people are not used to add "cc: stable" tag, I used
to pick bug fix commits from master by something like: list all bug fixing
patches and pick those that appliable to previous release.
Later, kudos to Thomas, who wrote an handy script (git-log-fixes.sh) to
do both, it indeeded make my life much easier. But it's still not enough.
It lists a lot of patches (206 fix patches, while 728 in total: the
ratio is near 30%):
$ devtools/git-log-fixes.sh v16.07..v16.11 | wc -l
206
$ git rev-list v16.07..v16.11 | wc -l
728
Thus I dropped few of them, manually, resulting to 130 (still looks like
a big number to me):
$ git rev-list v16.07..v16.07.2 | wc -l
130
The policy I would expect is, leave this tag as it is, I then will apply
all of them to a stable branch: I will no longer do the picking job. Instead,
I may just need handle those can't apply cleanly and ask the author to
do backport.
It would be do-able now, as I saw a lot of people are getting used to add
such tag. And even not, I saw those kind committers do that for them.
Besides, if there is already an explicit way, why should we stick on the
implicit way?
--yliu
> this will generate warnings when run against existing history.
>
> I don't know what can be done for this.
>
> Or should we keep CC: tags in commit log perhaps?
>
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-16 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-21 22:43 Thomas Monjalon
2016-11-30 14:54 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-11-30 15:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-11-30 15:26 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-11-30 15:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-11-30 15:36 ` Bruce Richardson
2017-01-16 9:51 ` Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2017-01-16 10:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-16 11:19 ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-16 14:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-16 14:46 ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-16 10:38 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-16 10:54 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-12-01 13:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Thomas Monjalon
2016-12-01 15:00 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-12-01 15:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170116095152.GQ9770@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com \
--to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).