From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mirq@rere.qmqm.pl>
Received: from rere.qmqm.pl (rere.qmqm.pl [84.10.57.10])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E747FAD9
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 20:21:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by rere.qmqm.pl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 777846082; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 20:21:53 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 20:21:53 +0100
From: Michal Miroslaw <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Message-ID: <20170118192152.5lmh656a3mmgz4jz@rere.qmqm.pl>
References: <f6d14b640928f69ab747793cd8749b48a1b74afb.1481590851.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
 <20161223014752.wicbgkvlotllsfc6@rere.qmqm.pl>
 <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0F876A@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <1502594.BWgYCgn4M3@xps13>
 <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F107553@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F107553@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-07-23)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] acl: remove invalid test
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:21:54 -0000

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 09:51:45AM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> > 
> > 2016-12-23 09:36, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > From: Michal Miroslaw [mailto:mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl]
> > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 06:48:52PM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > > > > I suppose that changes have to be inside:
> > > > > [PATCH v2] acl: allow zero verdict.
> > > >
> > > > The 'allow zero verdict' patch depends on this one if we are to not have
> > > > a breaking tests inbetween.
> > >
> > > Exactly, that's why I think they either has to be in one series of patches,
> > > with this one coming first and ' PATCH v2] acl: allow zero verdict' as the second one,
> > > or just merge them into one.
> > No progress here.
> > Konstantin, do you ack this patch?
> Yes, I do.
> I just thought that the author would resubmit it as part of 
> ' PATCH v2] acl: allow zero verdict'
> to comply with DPDK patch submission rules.
> Konstantin
> > I could apply it as a standalone patch.

Sorry for the delay. I'll do just that in a moment.

Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław