DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nélio Laranjeiro" <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: guillaume.gaudonville@6wind.com, dev@dpdk.org,
	Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
	Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/mlx5: fix Ethernet header re-writing
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 17:38:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170202163831.GS16389@autoinstall.dev.6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36c259d4-ed03-75b2-43ea-3de28facf1dc@intel.com>

Hi Ferruh,

On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 03:34:04PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 2/2/2017 10:34 AM, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote:
> > First two bytes of the Ethernet header was written twice at the same place.
> 
> Is this patch just prevents re-writing 2 bytes of buffer, or changes the
> buffer content as well?

It only prevents to re-write 2 bytes of the buffer.
 
> If buffer content also updated, I think it would be nice to mention in
> the commit log.

The buffer is only read.

> And if buffer content is not changed, will it be fair to say this patch
> is refactor patch instead of fix?

Well, I understand that it can be seen as not being a fix as the final
behavior remains the same.  Is it possible to change it to:
"net/mlx5: avoid re-writing first 2 bytes of Ethernet header"

> > Fixes: b8fe952ec5b6 ("net/mlx5: prepare Tx vectorization")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
> > ---
> <...>

Regards,

-- 
Nélio Laranjeiro
6WIND

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-02 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-02 10:34 Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-02-02 10:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/mlx5: fix Tx WQE corruption caused by starvation Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-02-02 10:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/mlx5: fix inline WQE consumption Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-02-02 15:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/mlx5: fix Ethernet header re-writing Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-02 16:38   ` Nélio Laranjeiro [this message]
2017-02-02 21:56 ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170202163831.GS16389@autoinstall.dev.6wind.com \
    --to=nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=guillaume.gaudonville@6wind.com \
    --cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).