From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BF82BB2 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:42:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id 196so7925000wmm.1 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 02:42:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1btY3uWlGCoSQ3ZVUvkNDGBuuPANyt9VanZSw4kSVJw=; b=zZxT43aKZ/8ePqAUw2sZdyf44arrbdRmNsP1sHFzsclbCy3jECwzFKELJE87yfsesi LKkOXqnQnlPFnKTqm3tsizEM2iMmZsa9SG5FwvG+lV6mLJKa9Fe83pgN7/PkLTktrjSc MPEw76XG5R4Ef9zWftKR2L98tHzmMVsMagBlCfBHGOHHQvzTRxiGNIOlWAbJEl9L5l4A ZoMVTN6zKLtZ4b7s79W86C3H+e8xdcOm9CD7Suqf7bWIBTatgO4JVAupaihBsYgxQZiR 7HoaG2RHKtYBNfs2L+Ey6x+dFqLNfFvzqjyW0EOcY9NWZy/VHhxcXiQBN0C+CQJADF11 XVcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1btY3uWlGCoSQ3ZVUvkNDGBuuPANyt9VanZSw4kSVJw=; b=mTC+4s7b5Lsmw1XDt52crJKWYwQNHQlnyJSHn65Owas5y3nmFEyobAuLmhxRfoKbdS 6/sZshfcEhuVrSs4kIMli4WnMpg0V45QsAZ48bfEDFGvnqGCmUtExQNS1OqIz/HrXV3I cK3lUpfshKur6x4YBeZmNHK8G2oszFOgDzzntfVWY1b/v5cfxT0BD6j9mlaGDwg9x0TR 5B8XLBQX3DLtP9IWTe2OzpViTMEkjI1gHB2M5KnnmtVfrhB5/D8X58ZWy7vTDBxF9D9d bycH1s12Ltw9qEpqaqJFQxWwu1AyjrFt1aRg9X6cTZcXBEZ8Ko1DEALs+m9t7nspLzGS 0ncQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39k4ocPmSRoPC5PttmX3JNRG8r4bbRPyNhB/3srLcxApVF4/+PxbOCLii9PyR+f7ZoNi X-Received: by 10.28.128.131 with SMTP id b125mr2084358wmd.7.1487932979388; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 02:42:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from platinum (2a01cb0c03c651000226b0fffeed02fc.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr. [2a01:cb0c:3c6:5100:226:b0ff:feed:2fc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 63sm9830711wrh.68.2017.02.24.02.42.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 02:42:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:42:56 +0100 From: Olivier Matz To: "fengtian Guo" Cc: "Lu, Wenzhuo" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Zhang, Helin" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "stable@dpdk.org" , "David Marchand" Message-ID: <20170224114256.186222f0@platinum> In-Reply-To: References: <1484153524-19337-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093B56823A@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093B56833D@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbevf: reset hardware whenstoppingport X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:43:00 -0000 Hi Fengtian, On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:15:27 +0800, "fengtian Guo" wrote: > Hi, Wenzhuo >=20 > The attachment is test report without product. The test report uses is a use-case with 6WINDGate, so it cannot be reproduced by Intel guys. I'll see how to reproduce the same case with testpmd and send an update. Thanks, Olivier >=20 > =20 > ------------------ Original ------------------ > From: "Lu, Wenzhuo"; > Date: Fri, Feb 24, 2017 04:54 PM > To: "fengtian Guo"; "Olivier > Matz"; "dev@dpdk.org"; "Zhang, > Helin"; "Ananyev, > Konstantin"; Cc: > "stable@dpdk.org"; "David > Marchand"; Subject: RE: Re:RE: [dpdk-dev] > [PATCH] net/ixgbevf: reset hardware whenstoppingport >=20 > =20 > =20 > Hi Fengtian, > =20 > Would you like to let us know how you validate this patch? As I=E2=80=99ve > tried just stop -> start VF can make it work again after PF down -> > up. Thanks.=20 > =20 > =20 > =20 > From: fengtian.guo@6wind.com.cn [mailto:fengtian.guo@6wind.com.cn] On > Behalf Of fengtian Guo Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 4:47 PM > To: Lu, Wenzhuo; Olivier Matz; dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin; Ananyev, > Konstantin Cc: stable@dpdk.org; David Marchand > Subject: Re:RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbevf: reset hardware when > stoppingport=20 > =20 > =20 > =20 > =20 > Hi, Wenzhuo > =20 > Sorry, Now I just notice the email is related with me. > =20 > > Seems the commit log doesn't match the code change. > > This change cannot resolve the described problem. The problem is > > VF doesn't handle the PF reset event. Moving the hw_reset from > > close to stop doesn't help and not necessary. Because PF has > > already reset VF stuff during resetting itself, that's why VF not > > working anymore. =20 > =20 > Explain the problem of this issue. > 1) it seems VF have to call ixgbe_reset_hw() when it receive PF > reset event. it seems VF is client and PF is server and VF has to > reset the register on his side, after PF has reset the register on > his side. 2) with this patch, when VF receive the event after PF is > set link down, it will call ixgbe_reset_hw() in ixgbevf_dev_close(). > and we have validate this patch=20 > =20 > Thanks > Fengtian > =20 > =20 > =20 > =20 > =20 > =20 > =20 > ------------------ Original ------------------ > =20 > =20 > From: "Lu, Wenzhuo"; > =20 > =20 > Date: Fri, Feb 24, 2017 01:21 PM > =20 > =20 > To: "Olivier Matz"; > "dev@dpdk.org"; "Zhang, Helin"; > "Ananyev, Konstantin";=20 > Cc: "Guo Fengtian"; > "stable@dpdk.org"; "David > Marchand";=20 > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbevf: reset hardware when > stoppingport=20 > =20 > =20 > =20 > =20 > =20 > Hi Olivier, Fengtian, > =20 > =20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz > > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 12:52 AM > > To: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin; Ananyev, Konstantin > > Cc: Guo Fengtian; stable@dpdk.org; David Marchand > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbevf: reset hardware when > > stopping port > >=20 > > From: Guo Fengtian > >=20 > > When PF triggers a reset, VF port must acknowledge it by calling > > ixgbe_reset_hw(). > >=20 > > Before this patch, the port link status, speed and duplex are > > invalid (all set to 0). > >=20 > > The patch move the call to ixgbe_reset_hw() from > > ixgbevf_dev_close() to ixgbevf_dev_stop(), so that after a port > > restart on the VM, the link status is properly marked down, with > > correct speed and duplex. > >=20 > > Fixes: f0160874c041 ("ixgbe: various updates") > >=20 > > CC: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Guo Fengtian > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand > > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz > > --- > >=20 > > Hi, > >=20 > > The use case for this problem was described some time ago, see: > > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-December/030067.html > >=20 > > It is also part of 2.2 release note: > > http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_2.rst= #n4 > > 71 > >=20 > > Regards, > > Olivier =20 > Seems the commit log doesn't match the code change. > This change cannot resolve the described problem. The problem is VF > doesn't handle the PF reset event. Moving the hw_reset from close to > stop doesn't help and not necessary. Because PF has already reset VF > stuff during resetting itself, that's why VF not working anymore.=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 5 +---- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > >=20 > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c > > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c > > index b7ddd4f..2d8641a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c > > @@ -4268,6 +4268,7 @@ ixgbevf_dev_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) > > PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE(); > >=20 > > ixgbevf_intr_disable(hw); > > + ixgbe_reset_hw(hw); > >=20 > > hw->adapter_stopped =3D 1; > > ixgbe_stop_adapter(hw); > > @@ -4294,12 +4295,8 @@ ixgbevf_dev_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) > > static void ixgbevf_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) { > > - struct ixgbe_hw *hw =3D IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data- =20 > > >dev_private); =20 > > - > > PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE(); > >=20 > > - ixgbe_reset_hw(hw); > > - > > ixgbevf_dev_stop(dev); > >=20 > > ixgbe_dev_free_queues(dev); > > -- > > 2.8. =20