DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Daley <johndale@cisco.com>
To: adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, John Daley <johndale@cisco.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] ethdev: don't consider device state when validating flows
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:36:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170324023659.28099-2-johndale@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170324023659.28099-1-johndale@cisco.com>

PMDs only consider if a flow would be accepted or not the assuming the
device had all it's resources available to it. Since state is not
considered, -EEXIST and -EBUSY return codes no longer make sense and
are removed. Also clarify the -ENOMEM has nothig to do with device
resouces, only host resources needed rte_flow_validate().

Signed-off-by: John Daley <johndale@cisco.com>
---
 lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.h | 21 +++++----------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.h
index 171a5698e..16846449d 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.h
@@ -932,15 +932,10 @@ struct rte_flow_error {
 /**
  * Check whether a flow rule can be created on a given port.
  *
- * While this function has no effect on the target device, the flow rule is
- * validated against its current configuration state and the returned value
- * should be considered valid by the caller for that state only.
- *
- * The returned value is guaranteed to remain valid only as long as no
- * successful calls to rte_flow_create() or rte_flow_destroy() are made in
- * the meantime and no device parameter affecting flow rules in any way are
- * modified, due to possible collisions or resource limitations (although in
- * such cases EINVAL should not be returned).
+ * The flow rule is validated against the target device. There is no check
+ * against the current state of the device- creating the flow could still
+ * fail due to a lack of resources on the device. This function has no effect
+ * on the target device.
  *
  * @param port_id
  *   Port identifier of Ethernet device.
@@ -965,13 +960,7 @@ struct rte_flow_error {
  *   -ENOTSUP: valid but unsupported rule specification (e.g. partial
  *   bit-masks are unsupported).
  *
- *   -EEXIST: collision with an existing rule.
- *
- *   -ENOMEM: not enough resources.
- *
- *   -EBUSY: action cannot be performed due to busy device resources, may
- *   succeed if the affected queues or even the entire port are in a stopped
- *   state (see rte_eth_dev_rx_queue_stop() and rte_eth_dev_stop()).
+ *   -ENOMEM: not enough host resources to execute this funtion.
  */
 int
 rte_flow_validate(uint8_t port_id,
-- 
2.12.0

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-24  2:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-24  2:36 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/1] proposed minor change in rte_flow_validate semantics John Daley
2017-03-24  2:36 ` John Daley [this message]
2017-04-06 20:50   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] ethdev: don't consider device state when validating flows Thomas Monjalon
2017-04-06 22:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/1] fix flow validate comments John Daley
2017-04-06 22:41     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] ethdev: " John Daley
2017-04-07  0:23       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " John Daley
2017-04-11 10:01         ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-04-20 18:49         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] doc: " John Daley
2017-04-21  8:11           ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-04-21  8:42             ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-03-24  9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/1] proposed minor change in rte_flow_validate semantics Adrien Mazarguil
2017-03-24 17:23   ` John Daley (johndale)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170324023659.28099-2-johndale@cisco.com \
    --to=johndale@cisco.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).