Re: [dpdk-dev] next technical board meeting, 2017-04-06

[Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>]

On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:09:04 +0000
"Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jay Rolette
> > Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 5:03 PM
> > To: Wiles, Keith <keith.wiles@intel.com>
> > Cc: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>; Jerin Jacob
> > <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>; dev@dpdk.org; techboard@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] next technical board meeting, 2017-04-06
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Wiles, Keith <keith.wiles@intel.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > <snip>  
> > >
> > > My Soap box comment:
> > >    I think we are limiting DPDK’s growth by only focusing on a few new
> > > PMDs and reworking the existing code. We need to look forward and grow  
> > DPDK  
> > > as a community to get more people involved in adding more applications  
> > and  
> > > new designs. I believe DPDK.org needs to be a bigger community and not  
> > just  
> > > a I/O library called DPDK. We need to actively move the organization to
> > > include more then just a high speed I/O library. Some will focus on DPDK
> > > and others will focus on providing a higher level applications, libraries
> > > and features.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Keith
> > >  
> > 
> > Yes!  
> 
> +1

Yes but it needs some architecture. Sorry but the features flying in are
just addressing single use cases and have no unifying model.