DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Daley <johndale@cisco.com>
To: adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com
Cc: thomas.monjalon@6wind.com, dev@dpdk.org, John Daley <johndale@cisco.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] ethdev: fix flow validate comments
Date: Thu,  6 Apr 2017 15:41:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170406224126.30345-2-johndale@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170406224126.30345-1-johndale@cisco.com>

Change comments for rte_flow_validate() function to indicate that flow
rule collision and resource validation is optional for PMD and therefore
the return codes may have different meanings.

Fixes: b1a4b4cbc0a8 ("ethdev: introduce generic flow API")

Signed-off-by: John Daley <johndale@cisco.com>
---
 lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.h | 17 ++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.h
index 8013ecab2..bbc5ec2e3 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.h
@@ -983,9 +983,10 @@ struct rte_flow_error {
 /**
  * Check whether a flow rule can be created on a given port.
  *
- * While this function has no effect on the target device, the flow rule is
- * validated against its current configuration state and the returned value
- * should be considered valid by the caller for that state only.
+ * The flow rule is validated for correctness and whether it could be accepted
+ * by the device given sufficient resources. The rule is checked against the
+ * current device mode and queue configuration. The flow rule may optionally
+ * be validated against existing flow rules and resources.
  *
  * The returned value is guaranteed to remain valid only as long as no
  * successful calls to rte_flow_create() or rte_flow_destroy() are made in
@@ -1016,9 +1017,15 @@ struct rte_flow_error {
  *   -ENOTSUP: valid but unsupported rule specification (e.g. partial
  *   bit-masks are unsupported).
  *
- *   -EEXIST: collision with an existing rule.
+ *   -EEXIST: collision with an existing rule. Only returned if device
+ *   supports flow rule collision checking and there was a flow rule
+ *   collision. Not receiving this return code is no gaurantee that creating
+ *   the rule will not fail due to a collision.
+ *
+ *   -ENOMEM: If the device supports resource checking: device resouce
+ *   limitation. If not supported: not enough resouces to execute the validate
+ *   command.
  *
- *   -ENOMEM: not enough resources.
  *
  *   -EBUSY: action cannot be performed due to busy device resources, may
  *   succeed if the affected queues or even the entire port are in a stopped
-- 
2.12.0

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-06 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-24  2:36 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/1] proposed minor change in rte_flow_validate semantics John Daley
2017-03-24  2:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] ethdev: don't consider device state when validating flows John Daley
2017-04-06 20:50   ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-04-06 22:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/1] fix flow validate comments John Daley
2017-04-06 22:41     ` John Daley [this message]
2017-04-07  0:23       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] ethdev: " John Daley
2017-04-11 10:01         ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-04-20 18:49         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] doc: " John Daley
2017-04-21  8:11           ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-04-21  8:42             ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-03-24  9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/1] proposed minor change in rte_flow_validate semantics Adrien Mazarguil
2017-03-24 17:23   ` John Daley (johndale)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170406224126.30345-2-johndale@cisco.com \
    --to=johndale@cisco.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).