DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: harry.van.haaren@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] event/sw: fix events mis-identified as needing reorder
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 16:18:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170414151815.12850-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> (raw)

When taking events from a port, we checked the history list to check if the
event needed to be put back in order i.e. originally came from a reordered
queue type. The check for reordering involved checking if the reorder
buffer entry pointer was null. However, after that pointer was used it was
never cleared to null again.

This caused problems when we had mixed reordered and atomic or parallel
events, as the events from the latter two queue types were misidentified as
needing reordering. This let in some cases to crashes, but mostly led to
dropping events, and then application lock-up.

Fixes: 617995dfc5b2 ("event/sw: add scheduling logic")

Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
 drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_scheduler.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_scheduler.c b/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_scheduler.c
index e008b51..a333a6f 100644
--- a/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_scheduler.c
@@ -448,6 +448,7 @@ __pull_port_lb(struct sw_evdev *sw, uint32_t port_id, int allow_reorder)
 				struct reorder_buffer_entry *rob_entry =
 						hist_entry->rob_entry;
 
+				hist_entry->rob_entry = NULL;
 				/* Although fragmentation not currently
 				 * supported by eventdev API, we support it
 				 * here. Open: How do we alert the user that
-- 
2.9.3

             reply	other threads:[~2017-04-14 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-14 15:18 Bruce Richardson [this message]
2017-04-14 15:28 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-04-19 22:31   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170414151815.12850-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).