From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 17/18] examples/l3fwd: remove checks for SSE4
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:23:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170620152313.107642-18-bruce.richardson@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170620152313.107642-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Since SSE4 is now part of the minimum requirements for DPDK, we don't need
to check for its presence any more.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
examples/l3fwd-power/main.c | 2 +-
examples/l3fwd-vf/main.c | 2 +-
examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c | 6 +++---
examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c | 6 +++---
4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/l3fwd-power/main.c b/examples/l3fwd-power/main.c
index 9d57fde..52eb835 100644
--- a/examples/l3fwd-power/main.c
+++ b/examples/l3fwd-power/main.c
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static struct rte_mempool * pktmbuf_pool[NB_SOCKETS];
#if (APP_LOOKUP_METHOD == APP_LOOKUP_EXACT_MATCH)
-#ifdef RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSE4_2
+#ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86
#include <rte_hash_crc.h>
#define DEFAULT_HASH_FUNC rte_hash_crc
#else
diff --git a/examples/l3fwd-vf/main.c b/examples/l3fwd-vf/main.c
index 797f722..5ac30b7 100644
--- a/examples/l3fwd-vf/main.c
+++ b/examples/l3fwd-vf/main.c
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static struct rte_mempool * pktmbuf_pool[NB_SOCKETS];
#if (APP_LOOKUP_METHOD == APP_LOOKUP_EXACT_MATCH)
-#ifdef RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSE4_2
+#ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86
#include <rte_hash_crc.h>
#define DEFAULT_HASH_FUNC rte_hash_crc
#else
diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
index 9cc4460..67e2ab1 100644
--- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
+++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
#include "l3fwd.h"
-#if defined(RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSE4_2) || defined(RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_CRC32)
+#if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86) || defined(RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_CRC32)
#define EM_HASH_CRC 1
#endif
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ em_get_ipv6_dst_port(void *ipv6_hdr, uint8_t portid, void *lookup_struct)
return (uint8_t)((ret < 0) ? portid : ipv6_l3fwd_out_if[ret]);
}
-#if defined(__SSE4_1__)
+#if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86)
#if defined(NO_HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP)
#include "l3fwd_em_sse.h"
#else
@@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ em_main_loop(__attribute__((unused)) void *dummy)
if (nb_rx == 0)
continue;
-#if defined(__SSE4_1__)
+#if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86)
l3fwd_em_send_packets(nb_rx, pkts_burst,
portid, qconf);
#else
diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
index f621269..7f30d65 100644
--- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
+++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static struct ipv6_l3fwd_lpm_route ipv6_l3fwd_lpm_route_array[] = {
struct rte_lpm *ipv4_l3fwd_lpm_lookup_struct[NB_SOCKETS];
struct rte_lpm6 *ipv6_l3fwd_lpm_lookup_struct[NB_SOCKETS];
-#if defined(__SSE4_1__)
+#if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86)
#include "l3fwd_lpm_sse.h"
#else
#include "l3fwd_lpm.h"
@@ -178,13 +178,13 @@ lpm_main_loop(__attribute__((unused)) void *dummy)
if (nb_rx == 0)
continue;
-#if defined(__SSE4_1__)
+#if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86)
l3fwd_lpm_send_packets(nb_rx, pkts_burst,
portid, qconf);
#else
l3fwd_lpm_no_opt_send_packets(nb_rx, pkts_burst,
portid, qconf);
-#endif /* __SSE_4_1__ */
+#endif /* X86 */
}
}
--
2.9.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-20 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-20 15:22 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/18] Increase minimum requirements for x86 platforms Bruce Richardson
2017-06-20 15:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/18] mk: require SSE4.2 support on all " Bruce Richardson
2017-06-20 15:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/18] acl: remove checks for SSE4 Bruce Richardson
2017-06-20 15:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/18] distributor: " Bruce Richardson
2017-06-20 15:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/18] eal: remove unneeded conditionals for SSE headers Bruce Richardson
2017-07-04 12:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-06-20 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/18] hash: remove checks for SSE4 Bruce Richardson
2017-07-04 12:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-06-20 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/18] ip_frag: check for x86 rather than SSE4 Bruce Richardson
2017-06-20 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/18] net: remove check for SSE4 Bruce Richardson
2017-06-30 9:44 ` Olivier Matz
2017-06-20 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/18] sched: " Bruce Richardson
2017-07-04 12:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-06-20 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/18] crypto/aesni_mb: " Bruce Richardson
2017-06-23 12:58 ` Declan Doherty
2017-06-20 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/18] crypto/kasumi: " Bruce Richardson
2017-06-20 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 11/18] crypto/snow3g: " Bruce Richardson
2017-06-20 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 12/18] crypto/zuc: " Bruce Richardson
2017-06-20 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 13/18] net/enic: replace check for SSE4 with check for x86 Bruce Richardson
2017-06-20 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 14/18] net/i40e: remove checks for SSE4 Bruce Richardson
2017-06-20 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 15/18] net/ixgbe: remove fallback code for non-SSE4 systems Bruce Richardson
2017-06-20 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 16/18] examples/ip_pipeline: remove macro check for SSE4 Bruce Richardson
2017-06-20 15:23 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2017-06-20 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 18/18] examples/performance-thread: remove non-SSE4 fallbacks Bruce Richardson
2017-06-30 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/18] Increase minimum requirements for x86 platforms Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-07-04 12:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-21 15:50 ` Bruce Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170620152313.107642-18-bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).