From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f175.google.com (mail-wr0-f175.google.com [209.85.128.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193EF2904 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:53:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c11so192646461wrc.3 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 09:53:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2Ndarwan83ANbjDte8FqICsIeVjnlK1RGlV3eVU05rM=; b=Fs6hOqhundqpCGwT2UfYY1JoleCK6v0BDxddHrSzz7OUPaqzqaS3zLJrTbpXvx2zj+ uK2eP6+AknYtvEm0jj5zjKlE7GlJa0WJ5w+ee57FcE7a/0hJb5js4SbuSSyTmpagklya 1n2+e1Cckfg9CsaF7qeJ2r3pRFKHx3Mu5oAKMPgf9xgpuJZSH6T49o2LT+3en0+YN7y8 tFGdQMrk8gBgCRThoSxGXwr207fIG6RCvFATiKdobzFHtzF0E610nYHP9IZVuLr1nr2w +gOb4xidfBbfJc6UnbkQvYaGccPN3LSLvH1jIA1kahtzhCB62ilmOpadZfwOSi4WmunC bTfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2Ndarwan83ANbjDte8FqICsIeVjnlK1RGlV3eVU05rM=; b=Eo2hbIpEvbpH/PlqhL5V5MdSQ+G2n89Jb60nxhr+BbfxoJgrIzD4f+BwtFrHYml4UL TCaYDfKT8dmwAUQA6InoGGKWFpx79kyvF72gKp/byLXWeGP/fZ93e1tEJ1LfHJ5mu1pO +UuexIY4nOFZvCRbzWM/k/Bk+dO8kcx/WMcom/EFI+T/nfPvy1+Ango5VVsZMaTV8ps5 0tIrv6jPDCqut73CADgXVDq/VcR7IR3VGNznLReh1Fbk6YbY87N/3qY37dpPobsj+NXz VV6ny3mSfNmSfrVo/tP6drMDOZZ5cDwIRXCJZNiGpNdp9uOAusCwTalzruzr4r9qGP7d lwGg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOydRJGPTzimrEuladNopD6YXC++sEqNME3yBVeZ0RXEZy+a61WG gQbXwWw+bHcjGdIW X-Received: by 10.223.173.140 with SMTP id w12mr26694797wrc.4.1498755210879; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 09:53:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6wind.com (host.78.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com. [62.23.145.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u18sm5082724wrc.14.2017.06.29.09.53.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 09:53:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:53:22 +0200 From: Adrien Mazarguil To: Vasily Philipov Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Nelio Laranjeiro , "Wu, Jingjing" , Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20170629165322.GR19852@6wind.com> References: <0dca86aa1372d6ff09d0aff01d522c580e0e24ab.1495717153.git.vasilyf@mellanox.com> <14badd6d6cb1db131832f3e406ed86e34c7938e9.1498658407.git.vasilyf@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <14badd6d6cb1db131832f3e406ed86e34c7938e9.1498658407.git.vasilyf@mellanox.com> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] app/testpmd: add isolated mode parameter X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:53:31 -0000 On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 05:03:57PM +0300, Vasily Philipov wrote: > In case if --isolated-mode parameter was added to the command line > the rte flow isolate action will be applied on each port before > the device configuring. > > Signed-off-by: Vasily Philipov The patch itself looks OK but I think the commit log needs some clarification, here's another suggestion: app/testpmd: add isolated mode parameter Providing this parameter requests flow API isolated mode on all ports at initialization time. It ensures all traffic is received through the configured flow rules only (see flow command). Ports that do not support this mode are automatically discarded. -- Adrien Mazarguil 6WIND