From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, techboard@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] git trees organization
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:03:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170914090349.GA50056@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5858182.HmkBWfGZLK@xps>
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:22:23AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 14/09/2017 04:25, Stephen Hemminger:
> > Bisecting a tree with lots of subtree merges is terrible. That is why Linus
> > rebases and doesn't directly take linux-next
>
> I agree, bisecting with subtree merges is not pleasant at all.
> That's why I chose the rebase method until now.
>
> Adrien mentioned some drawbacks with the rebase method.
> Ferruh mentioned some drawbacks and some advantages of rebase.
> Stephen mentioned another advantage of rebase.
> Such decisions are really difficult.
> One thing is sure: there will be always someone unhappy,
> no matter the decision :)
>
> When we want to take such decision or re-consider it,
> we ask the techboard to vote...
I'm not sure the techboard needs to vote on this, this is an issue for
the tree maintainers/committers is it not? If you do want techboard
input on this, I suggest the committers come to an agreement among
themselves, with community input, and then just look for tech board to
ratify it.
/Bruce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-14 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-11 22:03 Thomas Monjalon
2017-09-12 8:32 ` Bruce Richardson
2017-09-12 8:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-09-12 13:01 ` Wiles, Keith
2017-09-12 16:34 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-09-13 7:58 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-09-13 11:38 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-09-13 12:25 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-09-13 13:21 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-09-13 14:54 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-09-14 2:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-09-14 8:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-09-14 9:03 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2017-09-14 9:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-09-14 12:50 ` Wiles, Keith
2017-09-14 9:11 ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2017-09-14 17:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-09-12 16:32 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-09-12 20:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170914090349.GA50056@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).