DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: add note on hardware support deprecation
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 14:41:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170915134114.127774-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> (raw)

Following agreement at the DPDK Technical Board meeting [1], the policy
that hardware support deprecation should be treated as though it were an
ABI break needs to be documented in the contributors guide.

[1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-September/074613.html

Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
 doc/guides/contributing/versioning.rst | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/versioning.rst b/doc/guides/contributing/versioning.rst
index 8aaf370da..2ec561647 100644
--- a/doc/guides/contributing/versioning.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/contributing/versioning.rst
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ General Guidelines
 #. The modification of symbols can generally be managed with versioning
 #. The removal of symbols generally is an ABI break and requires bumping of the
    LIBABIVER macro
+#. Updates to the minimum HW requirements, which drop support for hardware which
+   was previously supported, should be treated as an ABI change.
 
 What is an ABI
 --------------
@@ -77,6 +79,13 @@ for significant reasons, such as performance enhancements. ABI breakage due to
 changes such as reorganizing public structure fields for aesthetic or
 readability purposes should be avoided.
 
+.. note::
+
+        Updates to the minimum HW requirements, which drop support for hardware
+        which was previously supported, should be treated as an ABI change, and
+        follow the relevant deprecation policy procedures as above: 3 acks and
+        announcement at least one release in advance.
+
 Examples of Deprecation Notices
 -------------------------------
 
-- 
2.13.5

             reply	other threads:[~2017-09-15 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-15 13:41 Bruce Richardson [this message]
2017-09-18 13:49 ` Mcnamara, John
2017-09-18 13:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
2017-10-13 20:46   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170915134114.127774-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).