From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D34101B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:30:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
 by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2017 04:30:02 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,412,1500966000"; d="scan'208";a="1220261524"
Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.221.24])
 by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 18 Sep 2017 04:30:00 -0700
Received: by  (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 18 Sep 2017 12:29:59 +0100
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 12:29:59 +0100
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: luca.boccassi@gmail.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Message-ID: <20170918112959.GD10264@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <20170915173612.13636-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170915173612.13636-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Research and Development Ireland Ltd.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] meson: compatibility with Debian/Ubuntu
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:30:03 -0000

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 06:36:09PM +0100, luca.boccassi@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> 
> A couple of small fixes are needed in order to make the meson build
> compatible with Debian and Ubuntu, to avoid breaking backward
> compatibility for applications that depend on the packages.
> 
> Debian and Ubuntu have been shipping a pkg-config file for more than
> a year, but it is called libdpdk.pc rather than DPDK.pc. A few
> downstream projects, like OVS and Collectd, have started using it in
> with the former name.
> To avoid breaking compatibility, rename it to libdpdk.pc.
> 
> Furthermore, in order to avoid breaking multiarch installability,
> add an option to let users install arch-specific headers in another
> subdirectory of the arch-independent ones. The reason is that some of
> the arch specific ones have the same filename, so there is a clash.
> The new option, include_subdir_arch, is disabled by default.
> 
> Finally a small fix to use the configure includedir rather than an
> hard-coded path for exec-env and generic headers.
> 
> Luca Boccassi (3):
>   build: rename pkgconfig to libdpdk.pc
>   build: add optional arch-specific headers install path
>   build: don't hard-code generic/exec-env install path
> 
Series Applied to dpdk-next-build.

Thanks,
/Bruce