From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2E11B299
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  6 Oct 2017 12:50:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20])
 by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Oct 2017 03:50:33 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,482,1500966000"; d="scan'208";a="160153547"
Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.221.37])
 by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 06 Oct 2017 03:50:31 -0700
Received: by  (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 06 Oct 2017 11:50:30 +0100
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 11:50:30 +0100
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Yuanhan Liu <yliu@fridaylinux.org>, dev@dpdk.org
Message-ID: <20171006105030.GA25712@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <20171006064558.GE1545@yliu-home>
 <6013017.jYmzBqReqL@xps>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6013017.jYmzBqReqL@xps>
Organization: Intel Research and Development Ireland Ltd.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [git pull] virtio changes for 17.11-rc1
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 10:50:34 -0000

On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 11:47:27AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 06/10/2017 08:45, Yuanhan Liu:
> > Hi Thomas,
> > 
> > Please consider pulling following virtio changes for 17.11-rc1 at
> >     git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-virtio    master
> 
> What about the other virtio/vhost patches pending in patchwork?
> 
Just my 2c here, is that there is currently a lot of code merged to the
*-next trees that is staged for the mainline, so whatever state it is
in, I'd like to see it all pulled ASAP. That way we all can work off a
common baseline.

Perhaps for the 18.02 release, we can see more frequent
pulls of the subtrees, so as to avoid having unsynced patches throughout
all trees?

/Bruce