DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] ethdev: add GENEVE to flow API
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 10:39:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171123093944.GG4062@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1511166121-743-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com>

Hi Andrew,

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 08:21:59AM +0000, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> enum rte_flow_item_type states that items matching protocol headers
> must be stacked in the same order as the protocol layers to match.
> As the result the patch changes ABI since Geneve is added just after
> VXLAN (the closest protocol).
> 
> In fact as far as I can see many items do not follow the requirement
> already. May be the comment/requirement should be removed and GENEVE
> should be added at the end of the list. If so, should be keep it just
> after VXLAN in all other places or move after ESP as well?

Perhaps documentation is unclear, this requirement only applies to
applications when constructing patterns out of those items (e.g. to make
sense, TCP is supposed to come after IPv4, not before).

New item/action definitions must obviously be added at the end of both lists
to avoid ABI breakage, there is no specific order to follow other than that.

What may have confused you is most of them are apparently ordered by
protocol layer, that's because those are here from day one; it's not the
case anymore starting with E_TAG, which was added much later.

Besides addressing the ABI breakage, I don't see any issue with adding
GENEVE to rte_flow, I only have a few more comments on subsequent patches in
the series. Otherwise good job, looks like you didn't miss anything.

-- 
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-23  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-20  8:21 Andrew Rybchenko
2017-11-20  8:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: add GENEVE flow pattern item Andrew Rybchenko
2017-11-23  9:39   ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-11-20  8:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] app/testpmd: support GENEVE pattern item in flow rules Andrew Rybchenko
2017-11-23  9:40   ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-11-23  9:39 ` Adrien Mazarguil [this message]
2017-11-23 10:07   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] ethdev: add GENEVE to flow API Andrew Rybchenko
2017-12-01 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Andrew Rybchenko
2017-12-01 10:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] ethdev: add GENEVE flow pattern item Andrew Rybchenko
2017-12-04 14:03     ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-12-07 23:52       ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-12-08 10:52         ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-12-08 19:06         ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-12-01 10:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] app/testpmd: support GENEVE pattern item in flow rules Andrew Rybchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171123093944.GG4062@6wind.com \
    --to=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).