From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C51F1B35C for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 09:33:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id n138so20268780wmg.2 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:33:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=udce9BG4UrRw5mUr5TGRpDb6h6zio4BOOMXsHs658t0=; b=UO4N3fjdUzLdPJrget5enbZ0K0TbVvdSBmjp/vE9kbZ9hXjb0f2d9A8p3PcKq/Bg1Q 35ut8DZoSjudThh0XH86ihykGCET1afNACeIxlvNDQMzoHgfLfiMO+Y1w+Uq4qJTZBxO XYUkNKBxGoiV5/V1auXj2KqXQl+NP4wuoJ+h7lHnx5dSNOYxOlMEP47vPEIKmI9jPDwS WN+XAbE37LVvu971i3B0W+8k0oePUwjIWug4wI+omzl7AH0iD5WIKF8joQ/Dp/vHdESx h7LsyCQeKyDOcyat4r14nrcmDQoY1VUFvt1aCIw2Vt1NuTrB9aFuUiz4Sq/PnldB53yy zZ4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=udce9BG4UrRw5mUr5TGRpDb6h6zio4BOOMXsHs658t0=; b=M/l0We6SMRilsGwwPpOvSV8rNSMgi2d+ueN1NScRONIyGE790z1LB5TRq5FBK34oyt oQT80L04syzseCIYYoDwY5xQg4V7uNY6Y5+7BexfLPrQdztHBqye1eaDojCagzAVeaBw 1aj3ENn4sZEob2Ftsx3UgoUi2s2wGtsRPjCzahMiiHJWDlMYl2C+CVbYGrVvczqOHM08 dhM1p/dTFD6RwC7ks/FCbm7loLQ+5fRHvvHh2eiQxoJACijmHnlxEkhGspkaZ3HLDCOp 3e0M01k4QgFe4hgWlx/OJZAZZ0TQ3+px2CYHuIa20h0e/wGGDxIfKNuXg8ipKEGMfkHs Snsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mI9S0ck28S3ZKfGj6g6/bFhNV7QIuvb0Cvs8/Y4TeXmdCi54QDG dIfiQE2M6P5wAUzrMCtIxvTOOzF0 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouRD7n/9TgSY5COlSdjqk1KxDaaEeU88OvU2/RTDBVExOl+ekdBhzWejKDpuH2Xph5S1IdUew== X-Received: by 10.80.166.156 with SMTP id e28mr13915270edc.51.1513931594545; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:33:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from bidouze.vm.6wind.com (host.78.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com. [62.23.145.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h20sm18424340edh.69.2017.12.22.00.33.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:33:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 09:33:01 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ga=EBtan?= Rivet To: Shreyansh Jain Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Message-ID: <20171222083301.mhrfefujr2kz4tgk@bidouze.vm.6wind.com> References: <3930fcee-7ff6-c6f9-273b-14c16bef6ab1@nxp.com> <20171213102552.nmrf73y7yvzexkz7@bidouze.vm.6wind.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 18/18] doc: remove devargs deprecation notices X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 08:33:15 -0000 Hi Shreyansh, On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:29:14AM +0530, Shreyansh Jain wrote: > Hello Gaetan, > > On Wednesday 13 December 2017 04:24 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote: > > Hello Gaetan, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Gaëtan Rivet [mailto:gaetan.rivet@6wind.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 3:56 PM > > > To: Shreyansh Jain > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/18] doc: remove devargs deprecation notices > > > > > [...] > > > While reading through the code, I also had the same feeling - there can be corner cases in the parsing functions which I can't imagine. Anyways, those need to be runtime-verified - static reviews may not suffice. > > > > > > > > I would certainly appreciate if you are able to fix the pci / vdev > > > limitation in rte_eal_dev_attach, as I am starting to be overwhelmed > > > with work (trying to finish a lot of things before the holidays). > > OK. > > Once you give the devargs a push, I will start work on the PCI removal from rte_eal_dev_attach. Before that, I just want to be sure of devargs with non-PCI bus (non hotplug case). > > > > And, thanks for tons of work you are handling. I saw the patches and really appreciate how you have split things up in sequential manner per-patch. It is difficult. > > Have you pushed the new version of the devargs patches? > Just wanted to check in case I have missed it. > No sorry, I am removing the dependency on the bus control framework from the devargs patchset. I finished the patchset otherwise (redid the unit test), but after some thinking I found that the bus control was maybe not ideal. I will send the devargs patchset soon, once it is made independent, and will expose the issue with the bus control. Best, -- Gaëtan Rivet 6WIND