From: Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
To: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
Cc: yskoh@mellanox.com, adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/7] net/mlx5: convert to new Rx offloads API
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 11:12:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180104101203.qov5cb6kurarivtv@laranjeiro-vm.dev.6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43ca45bbb786d83b7870b590f00a5b1027a33076.1514963302.git.shahafs@mellanox.com>
Hi Shahaf,
Please see bellow,
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 09:16:15AM +0200, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> Ethdev Rx offloads API has changed since:
>
> commit ce17eddefc20 ("ethdev: introduce Rx queue offloads API")
>
> This commit support the new Rx offloads API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
> Acked-by: Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
> ---
I have to remove my acked-by on this patch, there is an issue.
<snip/>
> +/**
> + * Checks if the per-queue offload configuration is valid.
> + *
> + * @param priv
> + * Pointer to private structure.
> + * @param offloads
> + * Per-queue offloads configuration.
> + *
> + * @return
> + * 1 if the configuration is valid, 0 otherwise.
> + */
> +static int
> +priv_is_rx_queue_offloads_allowed(struct priv *priv, uint64_t offloads)
> +{
> + uint64_t port_offloads = priv->dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads;
> + uint64_t queue_supp_offloads =
> + mlx5_priv_get_rx_queue_offloads(priv);
> + uint64_t port_supp_offloads = mlx5_priv_get_rx_port_offloads(priv);
> +
> + if ((offloads & (queue_supp_offloads | port_supp_offloads)) !=
> + offloads)
> + return 0;
> + if (((port_offloads ^ offloads) & port_supp_offloads))
port_offloads is wrongly named, it should be device_offloads and
this make things clearer.
Seems the mask is wrong as port_supp_offloads is a subset of
device_offloads.
For my understanding you want this statement to be true when the request
offloads is not supported, in such situation it should be a negative
mask i.e. ~(port_supp_offloads | queue_supp_offloads).
> + return 0;
> + return 1;
> +}
The same issue is present in Tx side.
Regards,
--
Nélio Laranjeiro
6WIND
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-04 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-23 12:02 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] convert mlx PMDs to new ethdev " Shahaf Shuler
2017-11-23 12:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] net/mlx5: store PMD args in private structure Shahaf Shuler
2017-11-23 12:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/6] net/mlx5: convert to new Tx offloads API Shahaf Shuler
2017-11-23 12:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/6] net/mlx5: convert to new Rx " Shahaf Shuler
2017-11-23 12:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/6] net/mlx5: fix VLAN configuration after port stop Shahaf Shuler
2017-11-23 12:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] net/mlx4: convert to new Tx offloads API Shahaf Shuler
2017-11-23 12:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/6] net/mlx4: convert to new Rx " Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-03 7:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/7] convert mlx PMDs to new ethdev " Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-03 7:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/7] net/mlx5: change pkt burst select function prototype Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-03 7:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/7] net/mlx5: add device configuration structure Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-03 7:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/7] net/mlx5: rename counter set in configuration Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-03 7:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/7] net/mlx5: convert to new Tx offloads API Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-03 7:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/7] net/mlx5: convert to new Rx " Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-04 10:12 ` Nelio Laranjeiro [this message]
2018-01-03 7:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/7] net/mlx4: convert to new Tx " Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-03 17:29 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-01-04 11:55 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-09 10:35 ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2018-01-03 7:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/7] net/mlx4: convert to new Rx " Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-03 17:29 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-01-10 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/7] convert mlx PMDs to new ethdev " Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-10 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/7] net/mlx5: change pkt burst select function prototype Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-10 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/7] net/mlx5: add device configuration structure Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-10 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/7] net/mlx5: rename counter set in configuration Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-10 9:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/7] net/mlx5: convert to new Tx offloads API Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-10 9:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/7] net/mlx5: convert to new Rx " Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-10 9:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/7] net/mlx4: convert to new Tx " Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-10 9:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 7/7] net/mlx4: convert to new Rx " Shahaf Shuler
2018-01-10 15:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/7] convert mlx PMDs to new ethdev " Shahaf Shuler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180104101203.qov5cb6kurarivtv@laranjeiro-vm.dev.6wind.com \
--to=nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com \
--cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
--cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).